BiharWatch is an initiative of the East India Research Council (EIRC) and MediaVigil. It focuses on Himalayan ecosystem, public finance, law and justice besides nature, philosophy, science, art and literature. It attempts to keep an eye on unalloyed truth, Central Himalayas, unsound business, courts, legislatures, governments, courts, jails, cyber space, the migrants from earliest times and neighbors.
Thursday, April 24, 2014
The PM, journalists, and the nuclear deal:SANJAYA BARU
The PM, journalists, and the nuclear deal
‘When Ram left, Dr Singh sat back in his chair looking completely satisﬁed. He had crossed the rubicon, he thought.’
Three senior journalists figured in the events as they played out in August 2007, recounts SANJAYA BARU
Wednesday, Apr 23 14:35:24, 2014
The Accidental Prime Minister—The Making And Unmaking of Manmohan Singh Sanjaya Baru Penguin/Viking 2014 Pages: 301 pages, Price: Rs 599
on 3 August 2007, the government was able to make public the 123
Agreement. After a careful reading of the agreement, N. Ram, chief
editor of The Hindu and a sceptic on the deal, wrote a
full-page editorial comment under the headline 'A Sound and Honourable
123'. He wrote enthusiastically.
is a sound and honourable agreement and the assurances provided to
Parliament by Prime Minister Manmohan Singh in 2006 have been fulfilled
virtually in their entirety,' said the editorial. The editorial
criticized the BJP for raising ill-informed objections. 'The Manmohan
Singh government has won for India the keys to unshackle its nuclear
programme from the unfair restrictions it has been subjected to for the
past 33 years.'
reading the editorial, I called Ram and thanked him on Dr Singh's
behalf. He sounded ecstatic and was full of praise for the PM. 'Tell the
prime minister he has made history!'
suggested that he should tell that to him personally. Ram agreed to fly
down the same day from Chennai. After checking with Dr Singh, I invited
Ram to have breakfast with the prime minister the next day. For more
than an hour over breakfast, Ram waxed eloquent on the deal, calling it a
great achievement for India and a great political coup for the PM.
Ram left, Dr Singh sat back in his chair looking completely satisfied.
He had crossed the rubicon, he thought. Ram was a close friend of
Prakash Karat, and himself a long-standing member of the CPM. Dr Singh
took Ram's endorsement as a signal from the Left that it would not
attack the deal. Rarely had I seen Dr Singh so pleased, so at peace, so
content as he was that morning.
hour or so later Ram called me at my office in South Block. Right after
his breakfast meeting with the PM, he had gone off to meet Karat.
I have bad news. The Left will not support the 123 Agreement. They will
ask the government to put the negotiations on hold.'
came as a shock. Ram agreed it was so, and said he, too, was surprised.
He had spent some time explaining the benefits of the deal to Karat but
the latter, he said, was not interested.
has taken a political decision,' said Ram. 'It is not about the merits
of the deal, but the politics. You have to tell the PM that he should
put the deal on hold. Karat will be making a statement asking the
government not to operationalize the deal.'
rushed to RCR to deliver the message to the PM. While driving down I
called Sitaram Yechury to seek an explanation. He confirmed Ram's
account and said this was Karat's decision and would have to be ratified
by the politburo. Yechury sounded displeased and helpless. It was he
who had read out in the Rajya Sabha the famous 'red lines' to the
government on what would be acceptable to the Left. He agreed now that
the 123 Agreement had offered reassurance on every one of the issues
raised by the Left and DAE officials. Neither Ram's friendship nor
Shivshankar's equations, nor indeed Yechury's best efforts, would come
in the way of Karat's decision.
A couple of days later, Dr Singh met Manini Chatterjee of the Telegraph (Kolkata) in his room in Parliament. She had just taken charge as the Telegraph's
Delhi bureau chief and wanted to meet the PM. It was a courtesy call,
not an interview, but it turned into one. The prime minister, still
angry, was in a talkative mood and was willing to be candid while
replying to her questions on the Left's demand. As his remarks became
more and more interesting and newsy, Manini realized she had a
front-page story. She sought the PM's permission to quote him and report
his views. He looked at me. I told him that if he truly felt this way,
he owed it to the nation to make his views known. This was an important
issue on which his critics were freely offering their criticism. He
should not remain silent, I said.
Singh agreed to allow Manini to report what he said. He only insisted
that since she had not recorded his remarks on tape she should clear the
text of her report with me before its publication. Manini and I sat in
an anteroom and shared our notes. She then went to her office, typed out
her story and emailed it to me. It was an accurate report and
I gave her the green signal.
Next morning, on Saturday 11 August, the Telegraph
ran the headline 'Anguished PM to Left: If You Want to Withdraw, So Be
It'. The report said, 'Tired of the Left parties' constant bark, Prime
Minister Manmohan Singh dared them to bite after their latest diatribe
against the Indo-US nuclear deal.' It quoted Dr Singh as saying, 'I told
them it is not possible to renegotiate the deal. It is an honourable
deal, the Cabinet has approved it, we cannot go back on it. I told them
to do whatever they want to do. If they want to withdraw support, so be
news report sent shock waves around Delhi. Narayanan and Nair called me
to find out if the report was accurate. They were not aware of the PM's
meeting with Manini, which had taken place in Parliament House while
they themselves were in South Block. It is also possible that neither
was as aware of the PM's anger and anguish as I had been.
reported that the Congress party's leadership was unhappy with the
interview and might want the PM to issue a denial. Since the PM's
statements were not taped, felt Narayanan, it should be possible to
issue a denial. I was appalled by that line of argument, but kept
silent. It occurred to me that they, along with Congress party
functionaries, might have already decided to get the PM to issue a
denial and to put the blame on me for what Manini had written. I
realized that the prime minister might come under pressure from his
party, and was not sure what he would do. I returned to my room, read
through my own notes of what exactly the PM had said and waited for the
journalists called to say that the Congress party was planning to deny
the story, saying Dr Singh never issued any such ultimatum to the Left.
One senior journalist called to tell me that Ahmed Patel had said to
him, 'How can Doctor Saheb issue any such ultimatum to the Left? He did
not bring them into an alliance with us, so he cannot ask them to go.'
the diplomats had done India proud, negotiating a historic agreement,
India's politicians let the country down. The hypocrisy of the Left was
exposed by the somersault Ram had to perform on the editorial pages of The Hindu.
After proclaiming the 123 Agreement 'sound and honourable', he followed
up with an editorial a few days later, toeing Karat's line and advising
the government to put the deal on hold. And Yechury, who had privately
agreed that the PM had done what he had promised to, publicly criticized
12 October 2007, both Sonia Gandhi and Dr Singh spoke at the Hindustan
Times Summit. In response to pre-approved questions that Vir Sanghvi
posed to Sonia, she said the survival of the government took precedence
over the nuclear deal and while the Congress would continue to try and
win over the Left it would do nothing to force the issue and risk a
break with the Left.
Singh watched her remarks live on television at 7 RCR. As soon as her
session was over, the PM's carcade left for Taj Palace Hotel where Dr
Singh was scheduled as the second speaker.
a pointed question, the newspaper's editorial director, Vir Sanghvi,
asked him, 'You made a statement to a newspaper which was a bit out of
sync with your persona and that started all the controversy. Do you
think you overstepped a bit?'
Singh responded with uncharacteristic firmness, 'I don't think I
overstepped. I was responding to a public statement issued by the four
Left parties and I don't think I overstepped. I am quite conscious of my
responsibilities and what I should say and what I should not say.'
fully aware of what Sonia had said before him, the PM parried questions
on the nuclear deal, saying his government was not a 'one-issue
government' and 'one has to live with certain disappointments . . . If
the deal does not come through, that is not the end of life.'