Monday, November 28, 2011

Prabhat Khabar Debates UID/Aadhaar & NPR project

Prabhat Khabar, a newspaper having 10 editions in Eastern India carries a debate on Unique Identification (UID)/Aadhaar Number and National Population Register (NPR) in its 28th November issue available here:

http://epaper.prabhatkhabar.com/epapermain.aspx?pppp=8&queryed=9&eddate=11/28/2011%2012:00:00%20AM

Sunday, November 27, 2011

Withdraw Aadhar scheme: Achuthanandan


Withdraw Aadhar scheme:


Achuthanandan


Express News Service
The New Indian Express
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM: Opposition leader V S Achuthanandan has demanded that the Aadhar scheme for Unique Identification card should be abandoned in view of the fact that even the Union Home Ministry has come to the conclusion that the exercise will ultimately affect national security.


Achuthanandan pointed out that Union Home Minister P Chidambaram had observed that an Aadhar card could be forged by anyone without any checks or scrutiny.
The Union Minister had even written to the Planning Board vice-chairman in this regard and the Population Registrar-General has also expressed doubts whether the card could be used for the population register.


The fears expressed on the security aspects of the card as well as citizen’s rights have been vindicated, the Opposition leader said. Achuthanandan alleged that it is commercial interests which guided the piloting of a scheme which has flopped globally.


http://ibnlive.in.com/news/withdraw-aadhar-scheme-achuthanandan/206233-60-123.html



Tuesday, November 15, 2011

DRAFT BIHAR LOKAYUKTA BILL, 2011

1
A DRAFT FOR
THE BIHAR LOKAYUKTA BILL, 2011
2
The Bihar Lokayukta Bill, 2011
A
Bill
Preamble. - To provide for establishment of Lokayukta institution and Benches, appointment of its Chairperson and Members and Staff and its powers and functions and for delivering justice to the general public.
Be it enacted by the Legislature of the State of Bihar in the Sixty-second year of the Republic of India as follow:-
CHAPTER I
PRELIMINARY
1. Short title and commencement.- (1) This Act may be called the Bihar Lokayukta Act, 2011.
(2) It shall extend to the whole of the State of Bihar.
(3) It shall come into force on such date as the State Government may, by notification in the Official Gazette, appoint.
2. Definitions. -(1) In this Act, unless the context otherwise requires,—
(a) " Allegation" in relation to a public servant means affirmation that such public servant-
(i) has abused his position as such to obtain any gain or favour to himself or to any other person to cause undue harm or hardship to any other person.
(ii) was actuated in the discharge of the functions as such public servant by personal interest or improper, corrupt motives, or
(iii) is guilty of corruption or lack of integrity in his capacity as such public servant.
(b) "Bench" means a Bench of the Lokayukta;
(c) “Chairperson” means the Chairperson of the Lokayukta;
(d) “competent authority”, in relation to—
(i) "Chief Minister" means the Governor;
(ii) "a member of the Council of Ministers" means the Chief Minister;
(iii) "a member of the State Legislative Council other than a Minister or the Chairman" means the Chairman of the State Legislative Council & “a member of the state Legislative Assembly other than a Minister or the Speaker” means the Speaker of the Bihar Legislative Assembly;
And
“Chairman of the Legislative Council and the Speaker of the Legislative Assembly” means the Governor;
(iv) an officer in the Ministry or Department of the Government means the Minister in charge of the Ministry or Department under which such officer is serving;
(v) a chairperson or director - members of any body, or Board or corporation or authority or company or society or autonomous body (by whatever name called) established or constituted under State Act or wholly or partly financed by the State Government or controlled by it means the Minister in charge of the administrative Ministry of such body, or Board or corporation or authority or company or society or autonomous body;
(vi) an officer of any body or Board or corporation or authority or company or society or autonomous body (by whatever name called) established or constituted under State Act or wholly or partly financed by the State
3
Government or controlled by it means the head of such body or Board or corporation or authority or company or society or autonomous body;
(vii) any director, manager, secretary or other officer of every other society or association of persons or trust (whether registered under any law for the time being in force or not) wholly or partly financed by the Government or in receipt of any sums under the Foreign Contribution (Regulation) Act, 1976 or any donation from the public, the head of the Society or the head of the Association of the Person or the head of the Trust.
(e) "full bench" means the bench of the Lokayukta consisting of the Chairperson and all the existing members of the Lokayukta.
(f) "grievance" means a claim by a person that he sustained injustice or undue hardship in consequence of maladministration;
(g) “inquiry” means every inquiry conducted under this Act by the Lokayukta;
(h) “Judicial Member” means a Judicial Member of the Lokayukta appointed as such;
(i) “Lokayukta” means the institution established under section 3 of this Act;
(j) “Member” means a Member of the Lokayukta;
(k) “Minister” means a member of the Council of Ministers (by whatever name called) for the State and includes a State Minister, a Deputy Minister and Parliamentary Secretary;
(l) “notification” means notification published in the Official Gazette and the expression “notify” shall be construed accordingly;
(m) "Officer" means a person appointed to a public service or post in connection with the affairs of the State;
(n) “prescribed” means prescribed by rules made under this Act;
(o) "Public Servant" means a person referred to in clause of Section 16(1);
(p) “regulations” means regulations made under this Act;
(q) “Schedule” means a Schedule to this Act;
(r) “Special Court” means a Special Court established under sub‐ section (1) of section 3 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 or Special Courts established under Bihar Special Courts Act, 2009.
(2) Words and expressions used and not defined in this Act shall have the meanings respectively which are assigned to them in the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.
CHAPTER II
ESTABLISHMENT OF LOKAYUKTA
3. Establishment of Lokayukta.- (1) As from the commencement of this Act, there shall be established, for the purpose of making inquiries in respect of complaints made under this Act, an institution to be called the “Lokayukta”.
(2) The Lokayukta shall consist of—
(a) a Chairperson; and
(b) two Members,
provided that out of “Chairperson and two members” at least two persons shall be Judicial Members.
Provided further that the Lokayukta appointed prior to the commencement of this Act shall continue as the first Chairperson till the completion of his term.
(3) A person shall be eligible to be appointed,—
(a) as the Chairperson or a Member if he is a person of impeccable integrity, outstanding ability and standing having special knowledge of, and professional experience of not less than twenty‐five years in, public affairs, administrative law and policy, academics, commerce and industry, law, finance or management and not less than fifty years of age.
4
(b) as a Judicial Member if he is or has been Chief Justice or a Judge of a High Court or qualified to be appointed as Judge of a High Court and not less than 50 years of age.
(4) The Chairperson or Member shall be a person who is / was not a member of the Parliament or a member of the Legislature of any State or Union territory and shall not hold any office of trust or profit (other than his office as the Chairperson or a Member) or be connected with any political party or carry on any business or practice any profession and accordingly, before he enters upon his office, a person appointed as the Chairperson or a Member, as the case may be, shall, if –
(a) he holds any office of trust or profit, resign from such office; or
(b) he is connected with any political party, severe his connection with it; or
(c) he is carrying on any business, severe his connection with the conduct and management of such business; or
(d) he is practicing any profession, cease to practise such profession.
(5) The Chairperson and every Member shall, before entering upon his office, make and subscribe before the Governor an oath or affirmation in the form set out in the First Schedule.
4. Appointment of Chairperson and other Members and Selection Committee.- (1) The Chairperson and Members shall be appointed by the Governor after obtaining the recommendations of a Selection Committee consisting of—
(a) the Chief Minister — chairperson;
(b) one Minister to be appointed by the Chief Minister - member;
(c) the Leader of the Opposition in the State Legislative Assembly or if there is no such leader a person elected in this behalf by the Members of the Opposition in the State Legislative Assembly in such manner as the Speaker may direct — member;
(d) outgoing Lokayukta - member;
(e) two sitting Judges of the High Court to be nominated by the Chief Justice of Patna High Court — member;
(f) one eminent citizen of Bihar to be nominated by the Chief Minister in consultation with the leader of the opposition and the Chief Justice of Patna High Court - member;
(2) No appointment of a Chairperson or a Member shall be invalid merely by reason of any vacancy in the Committee.
(3) The Selection Committee may, if it considers necessary for the purposes of selecting the Chairperson and other members of the Lokayukta and for preparing a panel of persons to be considered for appointment as such, constitute a Search Committee consisting of such persons of impeccable integrity and outstanding ability and standing having special knowledge of, and professional experience of not less than twenty‐five years in, public affairs, administrative law and policy, academics, commerce and industry, law, finance, management, or in any other matter which in the opinion of the Selection Committee, may be useful in making selection of Lokayukta and other Members of the Lokayukta.
(4) The Selection Committee shall regulate its own procedure for selecting the Chairperson and Members of the Lokayukta which shall be transparent.
(5) The term of the search committee referred to in sub‐section (3) and fee and allowances
5
payable to the members of the search committee and the manner of selection of panel of names shall be such as may be prescribed.
5. Term of officeof Chairperson and Members. - The Chairperson and every other Member shall, on the recommendations of the Selection Committee, be appointed by the Governor by warrant under his hand and seal and hold office as such for a term not exceeding five years from the date on which he enters upon his office or until he attains the age of seventy years, whichever is earlier:
Provided that he may—
(a) by writing under his hand addressed to the Governor, resign his office; or
(b) be removed from his office in the manner provided in section 7.
6. Salary, allowances and other conditions of service of the Chairperson and members.-The salary, allowances and other conditions of service of the Chairperson shall be the same as those of the Chief Justice of Patna High Court and other Members shall be the same as those of a Judge of the High Court:
Provided that if the Chairperson or a Member is, at the time of his appointment, in receipt of pension (other than disability pension) in respect of any previous service under the Government of India or under the Government of a State, his salary in respect of service as the Chairperson or, as the case may be, as a Member, be reduced—
(a) by the amount of that pension; and
(b) if he has, before such appointment, received, in lieu of a portion of the pension due to him in respect of such previous service, the commuted value thereof, by the amount of that portion of the pension:
Provided further that the salary, allowances and pension payable to, and other conditions of service of, the Chairperson or a Member shall not be varied to his disadvantage after his appointment.
7. Removal and suspension of Chairperson and other Member of Lokayukta. - (1) Subject to the provisions of sub-section (3), the Chairperson or any other Member shall be removed from his office by order of the Governor on grounds of misbehaviour after the Supreme Court, on a reference being made to it by the Governor, has, on inquiry held in accordance with the procedure prescribed in that behalf, reported that the Chairperson or such other Member, as the case may be, ought on any such ground to be removed.
(2) The Governor may suspend from office the Chairperson or any other Member in respect of whom a reference has been made to the Supreme Court under sub-section (1) until the Governor has passed orders on receipt of the report of the Supreme Court on such reference.
(3) Notwithstanding anything contained in sub‐section (1), the Governor may by order remove from the office the Chairperson or any other Member if the Chairperson or such other Member, as the case may be,—
(a) is adjudged an insolvent; or
(b) engages during his term of office in any paid employment outside the duties of his office; or
(c) is, in the opinion of the Governor, unfit to continue in office by reason of infirmity of
6
mind or body.
(4) If the Chairperson or any other Member is or becomes in any way concerned or interested in any contract or agreement made by or on behalf of the Government of India or the Government of a State or participates in any way in the profit thereof or in any benefit or emolument arising there from otherwise than as a member and in common with the other members of an incorporated company, he shall, for the purposes of sub‐section (1), be deemed to be guilty of misbehaviour.
8. Restriction on employment by Chairperson and Members after ceasing to hold office. - (1) On ceasing to hold office, the Chairperson and every other Member shall be ineligible for-
(i) re‐appointment as the Chairperson or a Member of the Lokayukta;
(ii) further employment to any other office of profit under the Government of India or the Government of a State;
(iii) Appointment to any such society or association of persons or trust (whether registered under any law for the time being in force or not) wholly or partly financed by the Government or in receipt of any sums under the Foreign Contribution (Regulation) Act, 1976 or any donation from the public, which is partially or wholly funded by the Government.
(2) Notwithstanding anything contained in sub‐section (1), a Member shall be eligible to be appointed as a Chairperson, if his total tenure as Member and Chairperson does not exceed five years.
9. Member to act as Chairperson or to discharge his functions in certain circumstances. -(1) In the event of the occurrence of any vacancy in the office of Chairperson by reason of his death, resignation or otherwise, the Governor may, by notification, authorize the senior‐most Member to act as the Chairperson until the appointment of a new Chairperson to fill such vacancy.
(2) When the Chairperson is unable to discharge his functions owing to absence on leave or otherwise, the senior‐most Member available, as the Governor may, by notification, authorize in this behalf, shall discharge the functions of the Chairperson until the date on which the Chairperson resumes his duties.
10. Secretary, other Officers and Staff of Lokayukta.- (1) The Secretary to Lokayukta shall be appointed by the Governor.
The Secretary shall be drawn from the Indian Administrative Service permanently allotted to the State Cadre, drawing pay in the super time scale of the service, or the State Superior Judicial Service in the super time scale, and shall receive the pay which he would have drawn but for his appointment as Secretary.
The Secretary shall hold office for a period as may be decided by the Government in consultation with the Chairperson.
7
(2) The other gazetted officers, the Ministerial Officers and the class IV staff in the Establishment shall be appointed by the Chairperson:
Provided that the Chairperson may, by general or special order, delegate to the Secretary the power to make appointment to a post or a class of posts in class of posts in class III or class IV specified in such order.
(3) Subject to the provisions of any law made by State Legislature, the conditions of service of Secretary and other officers including officers of the investigation wing and staff of the Lokayukta shall be such as may be specified by regulations made by the Lokayukta for the purpose:
Provided that the regulations made shall, so far as they relate to creation of posts, salaries, allowances, leave or pensions and working conditions, require the approval of the state government.
CHAPTER III
INVESTIGATION WING
11. Investigation Wing.- Notwithstanding anything contained in any law for the time being in force, the Lokayukta shall constitute an Investigation Wing for the purpose of conducting investigation of any offence alleged to have been committed by a public servant punishable under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988:
Provided that till such time the Investigation Wing is constituted by the Lokayukta, the State Government shall make available such number of investigation officers and other staff from such of its Ministries or Departments, as may be required by the Lokayukta, for carrying out investigation under this Act.
12. Investigation officer to have powers of police. -(1) No investigation shall be made by an investigation officer of the Investigation Wing below the rank of a Deputy Superintendent of Police or by any other officer of equivalent rank.
(2) The investigation officers of the Investigation Wing shall have in relation to the investigation of such offences, all the powers, duties, privileges and liabilities which police officers have in connection with the investigation of such offences.
13. Investigation officer to inquire on direction of Lokayukta.- (1) The Lokayukta may, before holding any inquiry under this Act, by an order, require the investigation officer of its Investigation Wing to make, or cause to be made, a preliminary investigation in such manner as it may direct and submit a report to the Lokayukta, within such time as may be specified by the Lokayukta, to enable it to satisfy itself as to whether or not the matter requires to be inquired into by the Lokayukta.
(2) The investigation officer on receipt of an order under sub‐section (1) shall complete the investigation and submit his report within the time specified under that sub‐section.
8
CHAPTER IV
PROSECUTION WING
14. Appointment of Prosecution Director. -(1) The Lokayukta may, by notification, constitute a prosecution wing and appoint a prosecution Director and such other officers and employees to assist the prosecution Director for the purpose of prosecution of public servants in relation to any complaint by the Lokayukta under this Act.
(2) The prosecution Director shall, after having been so directed by the Lokayukta, after due inquiry file a complaint before the Special Court, and take all necessary steps in respect of the prosecution of public servants in relation to any offence punishable under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 and Bihar Special Courts Act, 2009.
CHAPTER V
EXPENSES OF INSTITUTION OF LOKAYUKTA TO BE CHARGED ON CONSOLIDATED FUND OF STATE
15. Expenses of Lokayukta to be charged on Consolidated Fund of State.- The expenses of the Lokayukta, including all salaries, allowances and pensions payable to or in respect of the Chairperson, members or secretary or other officers or staff of the Lokayukta, shall be charged on the Consolidated Fund of the State and any fees or other moneys taken by the Lokayukta shall form part of that Fund.
CHAPTER VI
JURISDICTION IN RESPECT OF INQUIRY
16. Jurisdiction of Lokayukta.- (1) Subject to other provisions of this Act, Lokayukta shall inquire into any matter involved in, or arising from, or connected with any allegation or grievance against any public servant made in the complaint in respect of the following, namely:
(a) any person who is or has been a Chief Minister of the State,
(b) any person who is or has been a Minister of the State,
(c) any person who is or has been a Member of either house of the State Legislature,
(d) every officer referred to in clause (m) of Section 2,
(e) every officer referred to in clause (m) who on deputation or on transfer to foreign service is in the service or pay of -
(i) any local authority in the State which is notified in the Official Gazette;
(ii) any Corporation (not being the local authority) established by or under the State Act and owned or controlled by the State Government;
(iii) any government company within the meaning of section 617 of the Companies Act, 1956 (Act I of 1956) in which not less than fifty-one percent of the paid up share capital is held by the State Government of any company which is a subsidiary of a company capital is held by the State Government;
(iv) any society registered under the Societies Registration Act, 1860 (Act 21 of 1860) which is subject to the control of the State Government and which is notified by the State Government in this behalf in the Official Gazette;
(f) every head or his deputy by whatever designation he may be known of the Corporation, the Government company or a registered society referred to in sub-clause (iv) or any other institution or authority, subsidized by the State Government.
9
(g) any Chairperson or member or officer {referred to in clause (e) of sub-section (1)} or equivalent / above in any body / Board / Corporation / Authority / Company / Society / Autonomous Body (by whatever name called) established or constituted under an Act of State Legislature or Wholly or Partly financed by the State Govt. or controlled by it,
Provided that no investigation or prosecution shall be initiated without obtaining permission from a full bench of Lokayukta against; persons named in clause (a) & (b) of sub-section(1) of Section 16 of the Act.
(2) The Lokayukta may inquire into any act or conduct of any person other than those referred to in sub-section(1) of section 16, if such person is associated with the allegation of corruption under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.
17. Matters pending before any Court or Committee or authority before inquiry before Lokayukta.-In case any matter or proceeding related to allegation of corruption under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 has been pending before any Court or Committee of either house of State Legislature or before any authority prior to commencement of this Act or prior to commencement of any inquiry, after the commencement of this Act, such matter or proceeding shall be continued before such Court/Committee of either house of State Legislature/any other authority except for such matters as are protected under clause 2 of Article 194 of the Constitution of India or are pending before a Court, shall not affect the power of Lokayukta to inquire into such matter under this Act.
18. Constitution of benches of Lokayukta.- (1) Subject to the provisions of this Act -
(a) The jurisdiction, powers and authority of the Lokayukta may be exercised by Benches there of
(b) a bench shall be constituted by the Chairperson with one or Members as the Chairperson may deem fit,
(c) every bench shall ordinarily consist of at least one Judicial Member,
(d) Where a bench consists of Chairperson, such bench shall be presided over by the Chairperson,
(e) Where a bench consists of a Judicial and a non Judicial Member not being the Chairperson, such bench shall be presided over by the Judicial Member,
(f) The benches of the Lokayukta shall ordinarily sit at Patna and at such other places as the Lokayukta may, by regulation specify.
(2) The Lokayukta shall notify the areas in relation to which each bench of Lokayukta may exercise jurisdiction,
(3) Notwithstanding anything in sub section (2), the Chairperson shall have the power to constitute and reconstitute the benches from time to time.
(4) If at any stage of the hearing of a case or a matter, it appears to the Chairperson or a Member, that the case or matter is of such nature that it ought to be heard by a full bench, the case or the matter may be transferred by the Chairperson , or as the case may be, referred to him for transfer, to full bench as the Chairperson may deem fit.
(5) Chairperson may for the purpose of securing that any case or cases which, having regard to the nature of questions involving, requires or require, in his opinion or under the rules made in this behalf by the State Govt., to be decided by a Bench composed of more than two members issue such a general or special order as he may deem fit.
(6) Not withstanding anything contained in the foregoing provisions of this section, it shall be
10
competent for the chairperson or any other Member authorised by the chairperson in this behalf to function as a Bench consisting of a Single Member and exercise the jurisdiction, power and authority of the Lokayukta in respect of such classes of cases or such matters pertaining to such classes of cases as the Chairperson may by general or special order specify.
Provided that if at any stage of the hearing of any such case or matter it appears to the Chairperson or such Member that the case or matter is of such a nature than it ought to be heard by a Bench consisting of two members the case or matter may be transferred by the Chairperson or, as the case may be, referred to him for transfer to, such Bench as the chairperson may deem fit.
19. Distribution of business amongst Benches.- Where the benches are constituted, the chairperson may, from time to time, by notification, make provisions as to distribution of the business of the Lokayukta amongst the benches and also provide for the matter which may be dealt with by each bench.
20. Power of chairperson to transfer cases.- On an application for transfer made by the complainant or the public servant, the Chairperson, after giving an opportunity of being heard to the complainant or the public servant, as the case may be, may transfer any case pending before any bench for disposal to any other bench.
21. Decision to be by majority.- When in any matter heard by a Bench of two members, a difference of opinion arises between them on a point or points either member desire that the matter be referred it shall be referred to and heard by full Bench.
Explanation: In case the post of one member is vacant, the view of the Chairperson shall prevail.
22. Validation of act or proceeding.- No act or proceeding of the Lokayukta shall be invalid merely by reason of-
(a) any vacancy in, or any defect in constitution of Lokayukta.
(b) any defect in the appointment of the person acting as member of Lokayukta or
(c) any irregularity not affecting the merits of the case.
CHAPTER VII
PROCEDURE IN RESPECT OF INQUIRY AND INVESTIGATION
23. Provision relating to complaints and inquiry and investigation.- (1) The Lokayukta, on receipt of a complaint, may cause preliminary inquiry or investigation to ascertain whether there exists a prima facie case for proceeding in the matter.
(2) Every preliminary inquiry or preliminary investigation referred to in sub section (1) shall ordinarily be completed within a period of thirty days and for reasons to be recorded to writing, within a period of three months from the date of receipt of complaint.
(3) Upon completion of the preliminary investigation, the investigating authority shall submit its report to the Chairperson.
24. Persons likely to be prejudicially affected to be heard.- If, at any stage of proceeding, the Lokayukta-
(a) considers it necessary to inquire into the conduct of any person other than the prospective accused; or
(b) is of opinion that the reputation of any person other than a accused is likely to be prejudicially affected by the inquiry,
11
The Lokayukta shall give to that person a reasonable opportunity of being heard in the inquiry and to produce evidence in his defence, consistent with the principle of natural justice.
25. Lokayukta may require any public servant and any other person to furnish information etc. - (I) Subject to the provisions of this section for the purpose of any investigation (including the preliminary inquiry, if any, before such investigation) under this Act, the Lokayukta may require any public servant or any other person who in his opinion is able to furnish information or produce documents relevant to the investigation, to furnish any such information, or produce any such documents.
(2) For the purpose of any such investigation (including the preliminary inquiry), the Lokayukta shall have all the powers of a civil court while trying a suit under the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (Act 5 of 1908), in respect of the following matters namely:-
(a) summoning and enforcing the attendance of any person and examining him on oath;
(b) requiring the discovery and production of any document;
(c) receiving evidence on affidavits;
(d) requisitioning any public record or copy thereof from any court or office:
(e) issuing commissions for the examination of witnesses or documents;
(f) such other matters as may be prescribed.
(3) Any proceeding before the Lokayukta shall be deemed to be judicial proceeding within the meaning of section 193 of the Indian Penal Code (Act no. 45 of 1863).
(4) Subject to the provisions of sub-section (5) no obligation to maintain secrecy or other restriction upon the disclosure of information obtained by or furnished to Government or any public servant, whether imposed by any enactment or by any rule of law, shall apply to the disclosure of information for the purposes of any investigation under this Act and the Government or any public servant shall not be entitled in relation to any such investigation to any such privilege in respect of the production of documents or the giving of evidence as is allowed by any enactment or be any rule of law in legal or proceedings.
(5) No person shall be required or authorized by virtue of this Act to furnish any such information or answer any such question or produce so much of any documents-
(a) as might prejudice the security of the State of the investigation or direction of crime; or(b) as might involve the disclosure of proceedings of the Cabinet of the State Government, and for the purposes of this sub-section, a certificate issued by a Secretary certifying that any information, answer of portion of a document is of the nature specified in clause (a) or clause (b) shall be binding and conclusive.
(6) Subject to the provisions of sub-section (4), no person shall be compelled for the purpose of investigation under this Act to give any evidence or produce any document which he could not be compelled to give or produce in proceeding before Court.
26. Procedure for sanction of prosecution.- (1) Notwithstanding anything contained in this section so far sanction under section 197 code of Criminal Procedure and section 19 of Prevention of Corruption Act is concerned, the competent authority shall pass an appropriate order on the recommendation of Lokayukta within three months from the receipt of recommendation for sanction or permission.
(2) The provisions contained in sub-sections(1) shall be without prejudice to the generality of the provisions contained in article 311 and sub-clause (c) of clause (3) of article 320 of the Constitution.
(3) Notwithstanding anything in the Code of Criminal Procedure- no finding, sentence or order passed by Special Judge shall be reversed or altered by a Court in appeal or revision on the ground of the absence of any error, omission or irregularity in the sanction required under sub-
12
section (1) unless in the opinion of that Court, a failure of justice has in fact been occasioned thereby.
27. Action on inquiry in relation to Public Servants not being Chief Minister or Ministers. - (1) Where after the conclusion of the inquiry or investigation, the findings of the Lokayukta disclose the commission of an offence under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 by a public servant referred to in clause (c), (d), (e), (f) or (g) of sub-section (1) of section 16, any officer authorized by Lokayukta shall-
(a) file a case in the Special Court and send a copy of the report together with its findings to the competent authority;
(b) recommend to the competent authority for initiation of disciplinary proceedings under the rules of disciplinary proceedings applicable to such public servant;
(c) provide a copy of the report to the public servant or his representative;
(2) The competent authority shall, within a period of thirty days of the receipt of recommendation under clause (b) of sub-section (1), initiate disciplinary proceedings against the delinquent public servant accused of committing offence under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 and forward its comments on the report, including the action taken or proposed to be taken thereon, to the Chairperson ordinarily within six months of initiation of such disciplinary proceedings.
28. Action on inquiry against Public Servants being Chief Minister or Ministers.- (1) Where the matter relates to public servant refers in clause (a) & (b) of sub-section (1) of section 16 of this act the Lokayukta finding a prima facie case after following the procedure laid down in section 16(1) proviso, direct for inquiry or investigation.
(2) Where after the conclusion of the inquiry or investigation, the findings of the Lokayukta disclose the commission of an offence under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 by a public servant referred to in clause(a) & (b) of sub-section (1) of section 16, the Lokayukta may file a case in the Special Court and shall send a copy of the report together with its findings to the competent authority and also to the public servant.
CHAPTER VIII
POWERS OF LOKAYUKTA
29. Provisions relating to complaints.- (1) Subject to the provisions of this Act a complaint may be made under this Act to the Lokayukta -
(a) in the case of grievance, by the person aggrieved;
(b) in the case of an allegation by any person other than a public servant;
Provided that where the person aggrieved is dead or is for any reason unable to act for himself, the complaint may be made by any person who in law represents his Estate or, as the case may be, by any person who is authorised by him in this behalf.
(2) every complain under this act shall be made, as far as possible, in the forms prescribed and shall contain the following particulars:-
(a) Every complaint shall bear the heading title "before the Lokayukta of Bihar."
(b) Name or names of the complainant with their full addresses.
(c) Name or names of persons complained against with full address (es)
(3) All complaints made before the Lokayukta shall be duly signed by the complaint or, if he is illiterate, shall bear his left thumb impression duly attested by a literate person, clearly disclosing the name and full address of the attesting persons.
13
(4) Every complaint shall be supported by an affidavit as prescribed.
(5) The Lokayukta shall not investigate any complaint -
(a) involving a grievance, if the complaint is made after the expiry of twelve months from the date on which the action complained against becomes known to the complaint;
(b) involving an allegation, if the complaint is made after the expiry of five years from the date on which the action complained against is alleged to have taken place:
Provided that the Lokayukta may entertain a complaint referred to in clause (a) if the complainant satisfies him that he had sufficient cause for not making complaint within the period specified in that clause.
(6) Notwithstanding anything contained in any other enactment, any letter written to the Lokayukta by a person, in Police custody or in a jail or in any asylum or other place for insane person, shall be forwarded to the addressee un-opened and without delay by the Police Officer or other person in charge of such jail, asylum or other place and the Lokayukta may, if satisfied that it is necessary so to do treat such letter as a complaint made in accordance with the provisions of sub-section (2).
30. Investigation.- (1) Investigating officers of Lokayukta authorized to investigate offences under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 shall have all the powers which are vested in a police officer while investigating offences under the Code of Criminal Procedure.
(2) All investigating officers of Lokayukta superior in rank to an Investigating Officer may exercise the same powers as may be exercised by Investigating Officer.
31. Search and seizure.- (1) Where in consequence of information in his possession, the Lokayukta or the Officer authorized by it-
(a) has reason to believe that any person to whom a summon or notice under this Act, has, been or might be issue will not or would not produce or cause to be produced any property, document or thing which will necessary or useful for or relevant to any enquiry or other proceeding to be conducted by him may issue a search warrant, and authorize any officer not below the rank of Inspector of Police to conduct a search or carry out an inspection in accordance therewith and in particular to, enter and search any building or place where he has reason to suspect that such property, or document, is kept.
(2) A warrant issued under sub-section(1) shall all purposes, be deemed to be warrant issued by a Court under section 93 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.
(3) If the Lokayukta is satisfied that any document seized under sub-section(1) would be evidence for the purpose of investigation or enquiry under this act and it would be necessary to retain the documents in its custody or in custody of search officers as may be authorized it may so return or direct such officer authorized to retain such document till the completion of such investigation or enquiry.
Provided that where any document is required to be returned the Lokayukta or the authorized officer may return the same after retaining copies of such document duly authenticated.
(4) The provisions of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 relating to searches shall, so for as may be, apply to searches under this section.
32. Governance of Investigations.- All the investigations under The Bihar Lokayukta Act, 2011 shall be governed by Chapter IV of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.
Explanation: Notwithstanding the provision of the Act, the provisions of the Chapter XI of the Criminal Procedure Court 1973 relating to investigations, which is not inconsistent with this Act shall also apply.
14
33. Power to punish for contempt.- The Lokayukta shall have, and exercised jurisdiction, powers and authority in respect of contempt of itself as the High Court has and may exercised such powers and authority for this purpose under the provisions of the Contempt of Courts Act 1971 which shall have effect subject to the modification that -
(a) any reference therein to a High Court shall be construed as including the reference to the Lokayukta.
(b) any reference to the Advocate General in section 15 of said Act shall be construed as reference to such law officers as the Chairperson may specify, in this behalf:
Provided that such matters shall be heard by a full bench consisting of all members and Chairperson.
34. Power to Lokayukta to utilize services of Officers of State Government.- (1) The Lokayukta may for the purpose of conducting any inquiry utilize the services of any officers or investigation agency of the State Government, as the case may be;
(2) For the purpose of investigating into any matter pertaining to the inquiry, any officers of agency whose services are utilized under sub-section-(2) may subject to the direction and control of the Lokayukta.
(a) summon and enforce the attendance of any person and examine him;
(b) require the discovery and production of any document; and
(c) requisition any public record or copy thereof from any office.
(3) The officer or agency whose services are utilized under sub-section (2) shall investigate into any matter pertaining to the inquiry and submit a report thereon to the Lokayukta within such period as may be specified by the Lokayukta in this behalf.
35. Provisional attachment of assets. - (1) Where the Lokayukta or any investigation officer authorized by it in this behalf, has reason to believe, the reason for such belief to be recorded in writing, on the basis of material in his possession, that-
(a) any person is in possession of any proceeds of corruption;
(b) such person is accused of having committed an offence relation to corruption; and
(c) such proceeds of offence are likely to be concealed, transferred or dealt with in any manner which may result in frustrating any proceeding relating to confiscation of such proceeds of offence, he may, by order in writing, provisionally attach such property for a period not exceeding ninety days from the date of the order, in the manner provided in the Second Schedule to the Income-tax Act, 1961 and the Lokayukta shall be deemed to be an officer under sub-rule(e) of rule 1 of that schedule of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
(2) The Lokayukta shall, immediately after attachment under sub-section (1) forward a copy of the order, along with the material in his possession, referred to in that sub-section, to the Special Court, in a sealed envelope, in the manner as may be prescribed and such Court may extend the order of attachment and keep such material for such period as the Court may deem fit.
(3) Every order of attachment made under sub-section(1) shall cease to have effect after the expiry of the period specified in that sub-section or after the expiry of the period as directed by the Special Court under sub-section(2)
(4) Nothing in this section shall prevent the person interested in the enjoyment of the immovable property attached under sub-section(1) or sub-section(2), from such enjoyment.
Explanation - For the purposes of the sub-section, '' person interested" , in relation to any immovable property, includes all person claiming or entitled to claim any interest in the
15
property.
36. Confirmation of attachment of assets.- (1) The Lokayukta, when it provisionally attaches any property under sub-section (1) of section 35 shall, within a period of thirty days of such attachment, direct its prosecution wing to file an application stating the facts of such attachment before the Special Court and make a prayer for confirmation of attachment of the property till completion of the proceedings against the public servant in the Special Court.
(2) The Special Court may, if it is of the opinion that the property provisionally attached had been acquired through corrupt means, make on order for confirmation of attachment of such property till the completion of the proceedings against the public servant in the Special Court.
(3) If the public servant is subsequently acquitted of the charges framed against him, the property, subject to the orders of the Special Court, shall be restored to the concerned public servant along with benefits from such property as might have accrued during the period of attachment.
(4) So far as confiscation of property is concerned provision of the Special Courts Act, 2009 shall apply.
Explanation- For the purposes of this sub-section, the expression "bank'', "debt" and "financial institution" shall have the meaning respectively assigned to them in clauses (d), (g) and (h) of section 2 of the Recovery of Debts due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993.
37. Power of Lokayukta to recommend transfer or suspension of Public Servant connected with allegation of corruption.- (1) Where the Lokayukta, while making an inquiry into allegation of corruption, is prima facia satisfied, on the basis of evidence available, that-
the continuance of the public servant referred to in clause (c) or clause(d) of sub-section(1) of section 16 in his post while conducting the inquiry is likely to affect such inquiry adversely;
then the Lokayukta may recommend the State Government for transfer or suspension of such public servant from the post held by him till such period as may be specified in the order.
(2) The State Government shall ordinarily accept the recommendation of the Lokayukta made under sub-section (1) except for the reason to be recorded in writing in a case where it is not feasible for administrative reason.
38. Power of Lokayukta to give directions to prevent destruction of records during inquiry.- The Lokayukta may, in discharge of its functions under this Act, issue appropriate direction to a public servant entrusted with the preparation or custody of any document or record-
(a) to protect such document or record from destruction or damage; or
(b) to prevent the public servant from altering or secreting such document or record; or
(c) to prevent the public servant from transferring or alienating any assets allegedly acquired by his through corrupt means.
39. Power to delegate.- The Lokayukta may, by general or special order in writing, and subject to such condition and limitation as may be specified therein, direct that any administrative or financial power conferred on it may also be exercised or discharged by such of its Members or officers or employees as may be specified in the order.
40. Other power and function.-Lokayukta shall have also following functions and powers:-
I.(a) to monitor the investigation of offences under Prevention of Corruption Act , 1988 involving any act of corruption, for the cases initiated on behalf of the Lokayukta.
(b) to initiate prosecution before a Special Court established under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 and the Bihar Special Courts Act, 2009, for the cases initiated on behalf of the Lokayukta.
(c) to appoint prosecutors and Senior Counsels under Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 or
16
under the Bihar Special Court Act, 2009 or under this Act, for the cases initiated on behalf of Lokayukta.
(d) to get the Investigating Officer trained in modern methods of scientific investigation.
(e) to enquire modern equipments necessary for proper investigation.
II. (a) to receive complaints against any officer or staff of Lokayukta.
(b) to ensure the integrity of its functionaries and impose punishments of dismissal, removal and reduction in rank.
CHAPTER IX
SPECIAL COURTS
41. Special Courts to be notified by State Government.- (1) The Lokayukta may recommend for establishment for more Special Courts for the cases arising out of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 or under Bihar Special Courts Act, 2009 or under this Act and the State Government keeping in view the case load assessment may consider the proposal for establishment of more courts.
(2)The Special Courts constituted under sub-section (1) shall ensure completion of each trial within a period of one year from the date of filing of the case in the Court.
Provided that in case the trial cannot be completed within a period of one year, the Special Court shall record reasons therefore and complete the trial within a further period of not more than three months or such further periods exceeding three months each, for reasons to be recorded in writing, before the end of each such three months period but not exceeding a total period of two years.
42. Letter of request to another State in certain cases.- (1) Notwithstanding anything contained in this Act or the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 if, in the course of an inquiry or investigation into an offence or other proceedings under this Act, an application is made to a Special Court by the Investigation Officer of the Lokayukta that any evidence is required in connection with the inquiry or investigation into an offence or proceeding under this Act and he is of the opinion that such evidence may be available in any place in another State, and the Special Court, on being satisfied that such evidence required in connection with the inquiry or investigation into an offence or proceeding under this Act may issue a letter of request to a court or an authority in the another State competent to deal with such request to -
(i) examining the facts and circumstances of the case;
(ii) take such steps as the Special Court may specify in such letter of request; and
(iii) forward all the evidence so taken or collected to the Special Court issuing such letters of request.
(2) The letter of request shall be transmitted in such manner as the State Government may prescribe in this behalf.
(3) Every statement recorded or document or thing received under sub-section(1) shall be deemed to be evidence collected during the course of the inquiry or investigation.
CHAPTER X
Complaint Against Chairperson, Members and official of Lokayukta
43. Complaints against Chairperson and Members not to be inquired by Lokayukta. - (1)The Lokayukta shall not inquire into any complaint made against the Chairperson or any Member.
(2) Any complaint against the Chairperson or the Member shall be made by an application by the party aggrieved to the Governor.
(3) The Governor shall, in case there exists a prima facie case for bias or corruption, make a reference to the Supreme Court in the such manner as may be prescribed for inquiry into the complaint against the Chairperson or the Member.
17
(4) The Governor shall decide the action against the Chairperson or Member on the basis of opinion of the Supreme Court and in case the Governor is satisfied on the basis of the said opinion that the Chairperson or the Member is biased or has indulged in corruption, the Governor shall notwithstanding anything contained in sub-section(1) of section-7, remove such Chairperson or Member and also order of initiation of prosecution in case of allegation of corruption.
44. Complaints against officers of Lokayukta.- (1) Every complaint of allegation of wrong doing made against any officers or employee or investigating agency under or associated with the Lokayukta for offence punishable under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 shall be dealt with in accordance with the provisions of this section.
(2) The Lokayukta shall complete the inquiry into the complaint or allegation made within a period of 30 days from the date of its receipt.
(3) While making an inquiry into the complaint against any officers or employee of the Lokayukta or the agency engaged or associated with the Lokayukta, if it is prima facie satisfied on the basis of evidence available that-
(a) continuance of such officer or employee of the Lokayukta or agency engaged or associated in the post while conducting the inquiry is likely to affect such inquiry adversely; or
(b) an officer or employee of the Lokayukta or agency engaged or associated is likely to destroy or in any way tamper with the evidence or influence witnesses.
then the Lokayukta may, by order, suspend such officer or employee of the Lokayukta or divest such agency engaged or associated with the Lokayukta of all powers and responsibilities here to before exercised by it.
(4) On the completion of the inquiry if the Lokayukta is satisfied that there is prima facie evidence of the commission of an offence under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 or of any wrong doing it shall within a period of fifteen days of the completion of such inquiry order to prosecute such officer or employee of the Lokayukta or such officer disciplinary proceedings against the official concerned-
Provided that no such order shall be passed without giving such officers or employee of the Lokayukta or person, agency engaged or associated, a reasonable opportunity of being heard.
CHAPTER XI
FINANCE, ACCOUNTS AND AUDIT
45. Budget.- The Lokayukta shall prepare, in such form and at such time in each financial year as may be prescribed, its budget for the next financial year, showing the estimated receipts and expenditure of the Lokayukta and forward the same to the State Government for information.
46. Grants by State Government.-The State Government may, after due appropriation made by the State Legislature by law in this behalf, make to the Lokayukta fund or such sums of money as are required to be paid for the salaries and allowances payable to the Chairperson and other Members and the administrative expenses, including the salaries and allowances and pension payable to or of officers and other employees of the Lokayukta.
47. Annual Statement of accounts.- (1) The Lokayukta shall maintain proper accounts and other relevant records and prepare an annual statement of accounts in such form as may be prescribed by the State Government in consultation with the Accountant General of Bihar.
(2) The accounts of the Lokayukta shall be audited by the Accountant General of Bihar at such
18
intervals as may be specified by him.
(3) The Accountant General of Bihar or any person appointed by him in connection with the audit of the accounts of the Lokayukta under this Act shall have the same rights, privileges and authority in connection with such audit, as the Accountant General of Bihar generally has, in connection with the audit of the Government accounts and, in particular, shall have the right to demand the production of books, accounts, connected vouchers and other documents and papers and to inspect any of the offices of the Lokayukta.
(4) The accounts of the Lokayukta, as certified by the Accountant General of Bihar or any other person appointed by him in this behalf, together with the audit report thereon, shall be forwarded annually to the State Government and the State Government shall cause the same to be laid before each House of the State Legislature.
(5) An appropriate Committee of Bihar Legislative Assembly may decide to do an annual appraisal of the functioning of Lokayukta. The Lokayukta shall submit a compliance report, mentioning detailed reasons where it does not accept the recommendations of this committee, to the Governor. It shall be placed on the table of the House of Legislative Assembly of Bihar.
CHAPTER XII
OFFENCES AND PENALTIES
48. Prosecution for false complaint and payment of compensation etc. to public servant. - (1) Notwithstanding anything contained in this Act whoever makes any false and frivolous or vexatious complaint under this Act shall on conviction, be punished with imprisonment for a term which shall not be less than six months but which may extend to five years and with fine which shall not be less than Rs. 25,000/-.
(2) No court except a Special Court shall take cognizance of an offence under sub-section(1).
(3) No Special Court shall take cognizance of an offence under sub-section (1) except on a complaint made by a person against whom the false frivolous or vexatious complaints was made.
(4) The prosecution in relation to an offence under sub-section (1) shall be conducted by the Public Prosecutor and all expenses connected with such prosecution shall be born by the State Government.
(5) In case of conviction of a person [being an individual or society or association of person or trust (whether registered or not )], for having made false complaints under this Act such person shall be liable to pay compensation to the public servant against whom he made the false complaints in addition to the legal expenses for contesting the case by the such public servant as the Special Court may determine.
49. False complaint made by society or association of persons or trust. -(1) Where any offence under sub-section(1) of section 48 has been committed by any society or association of person or trust (whether registered or not), every person who, at the time the offence was committed, was directly in charge of, and was responsible to, the society or association of persons or trust, for the conduct of the business or affairs or activities of the society or association of persons of trust as well as such society or association of persons or trust shall be deemed to be guilty of the offence and shall be liable to be proceeded against and punished accordingly:
Provided that nothing contained in this sub-section shall render any such person liable to any punishment provided in this Act, if he proves that the offence was committed without his knowledge or that he had exercised all due diligence to prevent the Commission of such offence.
19
(2) Notwithstanding anything contained in sub-section (1) where an offence under this Act has been committed by a society or association of persons or trust (whether registered or not) and it is proved that the offence has been committed with the consent or connivance of, or is attributable to any neglect on the part of any Director/Manager/Secretary or other officers of such society or association of persons or trust, such Director/Manager/Secretary or other officers shall also be deemed to be guilty of that offence and shall be liable to be proceeded against and punished accordingly.
CHAPTER XIII
MISCELLANEOUS
50. Protection of action taken in good faith by any public servant. - No suit, prosecution or other legal proceedings under this Act shall lie against any public servant, in respect of anything which is done in good faith or intended to be done in the discharge of his official function or in exercise of his powers.
51. Protection of action taken in good faith by others. - No suit, prosecution or other legal proceedings shall lie against the Lokayukta or against any officer, employee, agency or any person, in respect of anything which is done in good faith or intended to be done under this Act.
52. Members, officers and employees of the Lokayukta to be public servants. - The Chairperson, Members, officers and other employees of the Lokayukta shall be deemed, when acting or purporting to act in pursuance of any of the provisions of this Act, to be public servants within the meaning of section 21 of the Indian Penal Code.
53. Bar of Jurisdiction.- No civil court shall have jurisdiction in respect of any matter which the Lokayukta is empowered by or under this act to determine.
54. Act of have overriding effect.- The provisions of this Act shall have effect notwithstanding anything inconsistent therewith contained in any enactment other than this Act or in any instrument having effect by virtue of any enactment other than this Act.
55. Provision of this Act to be in addition of other laws.- The provisions of this Act shall be in addition to, and not in derogation of, any other law for the time being in force.
56. Furnishing of returns, etc., to State Government. (1) The Lokayukta shall furnish to the State Government, at such time and in such form and manner as may be prescribed or as the State Government may request, such returns and statements and such particulars in regard to any matter under the jurisdiction of the Lokayukta, as the State Government may, from time to time, require.
(2) The Lokayukta shall prepare, once every year, in such form and at such time as may be prescribed, an annual report, giving a summary of its activities during the previous year and copies of the report shall be forwarded to the State Government.
(3) A copy of the report received under sub‐section (2) shall be laid by the State Government, as soon as may be after it is received, before each House of the State Legislature.
57. Power to make rules. (1) The State Government may, by notification in the Official Gazette, make rules to carry out the provisions of this Act.
(2) In particular, and without prejudice to the generality of the foregoing power, such rules may provide for all or any of the following matters, namely :-
(a) the term of the search committee, fee and allowances payable to its members and the manner
20
of selection of panel of names under sub-section (5) of section 4;
(b) the procedure of inquiry into misbehaviour for removal of the Chairperson or any other Member under sub-section (1) of section 7;
(c) the manner of sending the order of attachment along with the material to the Special Court under sub-section (2) of section 35 and 36;
(d) the manner of transmitting the letter of request under sub-section (2) of section 42;
(e) the manner of making reference to the Supreme Court under sub-section (3) of section 43;
(f) the form and the time for preparing in each financial year the budget for the next financial year, showing the estimated receipts and expenditure of the Lokayukta under section 45 ;
(g) the form for maintaining the accounts and other relevant records and the form of annual statement of accounts under sub-section (1) of section 47 ;
(h) the form and manner and the time for preparing the returns and statements along with particulars under sub-section (1) of section 47 ;
(i) the form and the time for preparing an annual report giving a summary of its activities during the previous year under sub-section (2) of section 56;
(j) any other matter which is to be or may be prescribed.
58. Power of Lokayukta to make regulations.- (1) Subject to the provisions of this Act and the rules made thereunder, the Lokayukta may, after approval of the State Government by notification in the Official Gazette, make regulations to carry out the provisions of this Act.
(2) In particular, and without prejudice to the generality of the foregoing power, such regulations may provide for all or any of the following matters, namely:-
(a) the conditions of service of the Secretary and other Officers and staff of the Lokayukta and the matters which in so far as they relate to salaries, allowances, leave or pensions, require the approval of the Governor under sub-section (2) of section 10;
(b) the place of sitting of benches of the Lokayukta under clause (f) of sub-section (1) of 18;
(c) the manner for displaying on the website of the Lokayukta, the status of all complaints pending or disposed of along with records and evidence with reference thereto under sub-section (11) of section 23;
(d) the manner and procedure of conducting an inquiry or investigation;
(e) any other matter which is required to be or may be specified under this Act.
59. Laying of rules and regulations.- Every rule and regulation made under this Act shall be laid, as soon as may be after it is made, before both House of legislature, while it is in session, for a total period of thirty days which may be comprised in one session or in two or more successive sessions, and if, before the expiry of the session immediately following the session or the successive sessions aforesaid, both Houses agree in making any modification in the rule or regulation, or both Houses agree that the rule or regulation should not be made, the rule or regulation shall thereafter have effect only in such modified form or be of no effect, as the case may be; so, however, that any such modification or annulment shall be without prejudice to the validity of anything previously done under that rule or regulation.
60. Power to remove difficulties.- (1) If any difficulty arises in giving effect to the provisions of this Act, the State Government may, by order, published in the Official Gazette, make such provisions not inconsistent with the provisions of this Act, as may appear to be necessary for removing the difficulty:
Provided that no such order shall be made under this section after the expiry of a period of six months from the commencement of this Act.
(2) Every order made under this section shall be laid, as soon as may be after it is made, before each House of the State Legislature
21
61. Repeal and savings. - (1) The Bihar Lokayukta Act, 1973) and the amendments made in it from time to time is hereby repealed.
(2) Notwithstanding such repeal anything done or any action taken in exercise of the powers conferred by or under the said Bihar Lokayukta Act, shall be deemed to have been done or taken in the exercise of powers conferred by or under this Act as if this Act were in force on the day on which such thing was done or action taken.
.
22
THE FIRST SCHEDULE
[See Section 3(5)]
I, ..................................................................... having been appointed Chairperson / Member* of the Lokayukta do swear in the name of God / solemnly affirm that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the Constitution of India as by law established and I will duly and faith fully and to the best of my ability, knowledge and judgement perform the duties of my office without or favour, affection or ill-will.
[*As the case may be)

Friday, November 11, 2011

India Proposes UN Committee for Internet Governance

The statement made by India at the 66th session of the United Nations General Assembly, in which its proposal for the UN Committee for Internet-Related Policy was presented.

66th Session of the UN General Assembly

New York. October 26, 2011.

Agenda Item 16: Information and Communications

Technologies for Development (ICT): Global Internet Governance


Statement by India


Mr. Chairman,

We thank the Secretary-General for his report on enhanced cooperation on public policy issues pertaining to the Internet, contained in document A/66/77, which provides a useful introduction to the discussions under this agenda item.

As a multi-ethnic, multi-cultural and democratic society with an open economy and an abiding culture of pluralism, India emphasizes the importance that we attach to the strengthening of the Internet as a vehicle for openness, democracy, freedom of expression, human rights, diversity, inclusiveness, creativity, free and unhindered access to information and knowledge, global connectivity, innovation and socio-economic growth.

We believe that the governance of such an unprecedented global medium that embodies the values of democracy, pluralism, inclusion, openness and transparency should also be similarly inclusive, democratic, participatory, multilateral and transparent in nature.

Indeed, this was already recognized and mandated by the Tunis Agenda in 2005, as reflected in paragraphs 34, 35, 56, 58, 59, 60, 61 and 69 of the Agenda. Regrettably, in the six long years that have gone by, no substantial initiative has been taken by the global community to give effect to this mandate.

Meanwhile, the internet has grown exponentially in its reach and scope, throwing up several new and rapidly emerging challenges in the area of global internet governance that continue to remain inadequately addressed. It is becoming increasingly evident that the Internet as a rapidly-evolving and inherently global medium, needs quick-footed and timely global solutions and policies, not divergent and fragmented national policies.

The range and criticality of these pressing global digital issues that continue to remain unaddressed, are growing rapidly with each passing day. It is, therefore, urgent and imperative that a multilateral, democratic participative and transparent global policy-making mechanism be urgently instituted, as mandated by the Tunis Agenda under the process of ‘Enhanced Co-operation’, to enable coherent and integrated global policy-making on all aspects of global Internet governance.

Operationalizing the Tunis mandate in this regard should not be viewed as an attempt by governments to “take over” or “regulate and circumscribe” the internet. Indeed, any such misguided attempt would be antithetical not only to the internet, but also to human welfare. As a democratic and open society that has historically welcomed outside influences and believes in openness to all views and ideas and is wedded to free dialogue, pluralism and diversity, India attaches great importance to the preservation of the Internet as an unrestricted, open and free global medium that flourishes through private innovation and individual creativity and serves as a vehicle for open communication, access to culture, knowledge, democratization and development.

India recognizes the role played by various actors and stakeholders in the development and continued enrichment of the internet, and is firmly committed to multi-stakeholderism in internet governance, both at the national and global level. India believes that global internet governance can only be functional, effective and credible if all relevant stake-holders contribute to, and are consulted in, the process.

Bearing in mind the need for a transparent, democratic, and multilateral mechanism that enables all stakeholders to participate in their respective roles, to address the many cross-cutting international public policy issues that require attention and are not adequately addressed by current mechanisms and the need for enhanced cooperation to enable governments, on an equal footing, to carry out their roles and responsibilities in international public policy issues pertaining to the Internet, India proposes the establishment of a new institutional mechanism in the United Nations for global internet-related policies, to be called the United Nations Committee for Internet-Related Policies (CIRP). The intent behind proposing a multilateral and multi-stakeholder mechanism is not to “control the internet’’ or allow Governments to have the last word in regulating the internet, but to make sure that the Internet is governed not unilaterally, but in an open, democratic, inclusive and participatory manner, with the participation of all stakeholders, so as to evolve universally acceptable, and globally harmonized policies in important areas and pave the way for a credible, constantly evolving, stable and well-functioning Internet that plays its due role in improving the quality of peoples’ lives everywhere.

The CIRP shall be mandated to undertake the following tasks:

  1. Develop and establish international public policies with a view to ensuring coordination and coherence in cross-cutting Internet-related global issues;
  2. Coordinate and oversee the bodies responsible for technical and operational functioning of the Internet, including global standards setting;
  3. Facilitate negotiation of treaties, conventions and agreements on Internet-related public policies;
  4. Address developmental issues related to the internet;
  5. Promote the promotion and protection of all human rights, namely, civil, political, social, economic and cultural rights, including the Right to Development;
  6. Undertake arbitration and dispute resolution, where necessary; and,
  7. Crisis management in relation to the Internet.


The main features of CIRP are provided in the annex to this statement. In brief, the CIRP will comprise 50 Member States chosen on the basis of equitable geographical representation, and will meet annually for two working weeks in Geneva. It will ensure the participation of all relevant stakeholders by establishing four Advisory Groups, one each for civil society, the private sector, inter-governmental and international organizations, and the technical and academic community. The Advisory Groups will provide their inputs and recommendations to the CIRP. The meetings of CIRP and the advisory groups will be serviced by the UNCTAD Secretariat that also services the meetings of the Commission on Science and Technology for Development. The Internet Governance Forum will provide inputs to CIRP in the spirit of complementarity between the two. CIRP will report directly to the General Assembly and present recommendations for consideration, adoption and dissemination among all relevant inter-governmental bodies and international organizations. CIRP will be supported by the regular budget of the United Nations; a separate Fund would be set up by drawing from the domain registration fees collected by various bodies, in order to mainly finance the Research Wing to be established by CIRP to support its activities.

Those familiar with the discourse on global internet governance since the beginning of the WSIS process at the turn of the millennium, will recognize that neither the mandated tasks of the CIRP, nor its proposed modalities, are new. The Working Group on Internet Governance (WGIG) set up by the UN Secretary- General had explicitly recognized the institutional gaps in global internet governance and had proposed four institutional models in its report to the UN General Assembly in 2005. The contours of the CIRP, as proposed above, reflect the common elements in the four WGIG institutional models. While the excellent report of the WGIG was much discussed and deliberated in 2005, unfortunately, no concrete follow-up action was taken to give effect to its recommendations on the institutional front. We hope that this anomaly will be redressed at least six years later, with the timely establishment of the CIRP.

In order to operationalize this proposal, India calls for the establishment of an open-ended working group under the Commission on Science and Technology for Development for drawing up the detailed terms of reference for CIRP, with a view to actualizing it within the next 18 months. We are open to the views and suggestions of all Member States, and stand ready to work with other delegations to carry forward this proposal, and thus seek to fill the serious gap in the implementation of the Tunis Agenda, by providing substance and content to the concept of Enhanced Co-operation enshrined in the Tunis Agenda.

Thank you, Mr. Chairman.

***

Annex

The United Nations Committee for Internet-Related Policies (CIRP)


The United Nations Committee for Internet-Related Policies (CIRP) will have the following features:

Membership: The CIRP will consist of 50 Member States of the United Nations, chosen/elected on the basis of equitable geographical representation. It will provide for equitable representation of all UN Member States, in accordance with established UN principles and practices. It will have a Bureau consisting of one Chair, three Vice-Chairs and a Rapporteur.

Meetings: The CIRP will meet annually for two working weeks in Geneva, preferably in May/June, and convene additional meetings, as and when required. The UNCTAD Secretariat will provide substantive and logistical support to the CIRP by servicing these meetings.

Multi-stakeholder participation: Recognizing the need to involve all stakeholders in Global Internet Governance in their respective roles, the CIRP shall ensure the participation of all stakeholders recognized in the Tunis Agenda. Four Advisory Groups – one each for Civil Society, the Private Sector, Inter-Governmental and International Organisations, and the Technical and Academic Community - will be established, to assist and advise the CIRP. These Groups would be self-organized, as per agreed principles, to ensure transparency, representativity and inclusiveness. The Advisory Groups will meet annually in Geneva and in conjunction with any additional meetings of the CIRP. Their meetings will be held back-to- back with the meetings of the CIRP, so that they are able to provide their inputs and recommendations in a timely manner, to the CIRP.

Reporting: The CIRP will report directly to the UN General Assembly annually, on its meetings and present recommendations in the areas of policy and implementation for consideration, adoption and dissemination to all relevant inter-governmental bodies and international organizations. .

Research Wing: The Internet is a rapidly-evolving and dynamic medium that throws up urgent and rapidly-evolving challenges that need timely solutions. In order to deal effectively and prudently with these emerging issues in a timely manner, it would be vital to have a well-resourced Research Wing attached to the CIRP to provide ready and comprehensive background material, analysis and inputs to the CIRP, as required.

Links with the IGF: Recognizing the value of the Internet Governance Forum as an open, unique forum for multi-stakeholder policy dialogue on Internet issues, the deliberations in the IGF along with any inputs, background information and analysis it may provide, will be taken as inputs for consideration of the CIRP. An improved and strengthened IGF that can serve as a purposeful body for policy consultations and provide meaningful policy inputs to the CIRP, will ensure a stronger and more effective complementarity between the CIRP and the IGF.

Budget: Like other UN bodies, the CIRP should be supported by the regular budget of the United Nations. In addition, keeping in view its unique multi-stakeholder format for inclusive participation, and the need for a well-resourced Research Wing and regular meetings, a separate Fund should also be set up drawing from the domain registration fees collected by various bodies involved in the technical functioning of the Internet, especially in terms of names and addresses.

***

Excerpts from the Tunis Agenda

Paragraph 34 of the Tunis Agenda defines Internet Governance as “the development and application by governments, the private sector and civil society, in their respective roles, of shared principles, norms, rules, decision-making procedures, and programmes that shape the evolution and use of the Internet”.

Paragraph 35 reaffirms the respective roles of stakeholders as follows: “(a) Policy authority for Internet-related public policy issues is the sovereign right of States. They have rights and responsibilities for international Internet-related public policy issues”. (b) The private sector has had, and should continue to have, an important role in the development of the Internet, both in the technical an economic fields. (c) Civil society has also played an important role on Internet matters, especially at community level, and should continue to play such a role. (d) Intergovernmental organizations have had, and should continue to have, a facilitating role in the coordination of Internet-related public policy issues. (e) International organizations have also had and should continue to have an important role in the development of Internet-related technical standards and relevant policies.”

While delineating the respective roles of stakeholders, Paragraph 56 recognizes the need for an inclusive, multi-stakeholder approach by affirming that “The Internet remains a highly dynamic medium and therefore any framework and mechanisms designed to deal with Internet governance should be inclusive and responsive to the exponential growth and fast evolution of the Internet as a common platform for the development of multiple applications”.

Paragraph 58 recognizes “that Internet governance includes more than Internet naming and addressing. It also includes other significant public policy issues such as, inter alia, critical Internet resources, the security and safety of the Internet, and developmental aspects and issues pertaining to the use of the Internet”.

Paragraph 59 further recognizes that “Internet governance includes social, economic and technical issues including affordability, reliability and quality of service”. Paragraph 60 further recognizes that “there are many cross-cutting international public policy issues that require attention and are not adequately addressed by the current mechanisms”.

Paragraph 61 of the Tunis Agenda therefore concludes that “We are convinced that there is a need to initiate, and reinforce, as appropriate, a transparent, democratic, and multilateral process, with the participation of governments, private sector, civil society and international organisations, in their respective roles. This process could envisage creation of a suitable framework or mechanisms, where justified, thus spurring the ongoing and active evolution of the current arrangements in order to synergize the efforts in this regard”.

Paragraph 69 further recognizes “the need for enhanced cooperation in the future, to enable governments, on an equal footing, to carry out their roles and responsibilities, in international public policy issues pertaining to the Internet, but not in the day-to-day technical and operational matters, that do not impact on international public policy issues”.

Sunday, November 6, 2011

Communist Party of China delegation visits Patna

A 12-member Chinese delegation of the Communist Party of China visited Patna. The delegation came from the Gansu province of China. It spent two days in Bihar under the Chinese-Indian Mutual Exchange program of 2011. It has been noted that both Bihar and Gansu are heavily dependent on agriculture. Earlier, Bihar Chief Minister had visited China.

Post 2014, a non-UPA, non-NDA Govt?

Note: Assuming that UPA and NDA- both ruling parties- will be decimated in 2014, will the political formation that would become ruling party change the policies, programmes or projects launched during the corrupt regime of UPA and NDA? The third formation must announce its own policies, programmes or projects in order to be taken seriously by the electorate.

gopal krishna

CPI RULES OUT THIRD TERM FOR UPA


A B Bardhan, Senior Communist Party of India (CPI) leader has said the Congress party-led UPA Government belongs to corporate houses. It may not have been reported but the same holds true for NDA as well.

Bardhan said, "We will fight over all these issues. We will fight at the grass root levels. We will fight for jobs, for food security, against corruption and when I talk about food security it also means against price rise".

He said, people would not vote either for the Congress or the BJP in the next Lok Sabha elections in 2014 at a meeting of intellectuals at Vidhayak Club. "Politics starts when people come out on streets. Sitting in a club or any party office, we cannot discuss politics," he said. He noted that "Efforts are also on for corporate farming".

The CPI leader said that the party would organize its 21st congress in Patna from March 27-31, 2012. The party has chosen Hindi belt for this purpose. During the convention, party leaders would discuss the party's programmes and the reasons for its defeat in the last state assembly polls.

During his earlier visit, Bardhan had addressed the Bihar state council meet of his party in Patna on July 5, 2011.

Saturday, November 5, 2011

महंगाई धीमी मौत की तरह है: हाई कोर्ट

पीटीआई, एजेंसियां
कोच्चि।। पेट्रोल की कीमतों में बार-बार बढ़ोतरी पर केरल हाई कोर्ट ने सख्त रुख अपनाया है। उसने शुक्रवार को कहा कि सरकारें इस मसले पर अपनी जिम्मेदारी से पल्ला नहीं झाड़ सकतीं। इसके विरोध के लिए राजनीतिक दलों का इंतजार करने के बजाय देश के लोगों को खुद सामने आना चाहिए। अदालत ने इंडियन ऑयल कॉरपोरेशन और रिलायंस पेट्रोलियम को अपनी बैलेंस शीट और तिमाही रिपोर्ट तीन सप्ताह में पेश करने का निदेर्श दिया।

एक जनहित याचिका पर सुनवाई करते हुए एक्टिंग चीफ जस्टिस सी.एन. रामचंद्रन नायन और जस्टिस पी.एस. गोपीनाथन ने मौखिक टिप्पणी में कहा कि पिछले एक साल में तेल के दाम 40 पर्सेंट से ज्यादा बढ़ गए हैं। इससे आम आदमी को भारी परेशानी का सामना करना पड़ रहा है। महंगाई धीमी मौत की तरह है।

राजनीतिक दल मुनाफा बटोर रहे हैं। उपभोक्ता विरोध नहीं कर पा रहे हैं। बार-बार की बढ़ोतरी में उन्हें ऐडजस्ट करना पड़ रहा है। अदालत ने कहा कि इस बढ़ोतरी से टू-वीइलर और छोटी कार चलाने वाले ज्यादा प्रभावित होते हैं, अमीर लोग नहीं क्योंकि वे डीजल की महंगी कारों में चलते हैं।

तेल कंपनियों को पेट्रोल के दाम बढ़ाने का अधिकार देने और बार-बार पेट्रोल महंगा होने के विरोध में यह जनहित याचिका पूर्व सांसद पी.सी. थॉमस ने दायर की है। राज्य सरकार के वकील ने तर्क दिया कि यह याचिका राजनीति से प्रेरित है। इस पर कोर्ट ने यह कहते हुए कि राजनीति में भी जनहित जुड़ा होता है, याचिका सुनवाई के लिए स्वीकार कर ली। हालांकि अदालत का कहना था कि तेल उत्पादों के दाम तय करने का अधिकार देना केंद सरकार का पॉलिसी मैटर है, पेट्रोल की मौजूदा बढ़ोतरी पर हम इसमें दखल नहीं दे सकते। पेट्रोल के दाम में बढ़ोतरी राष्ट्रीय मुद्दा है। हम इस पर स्टे नहीं लगा सकते।

महंगाई धीमी मौत की तरह है: हाई कोर्ट

पीटीआई, एजेंसियां
कोच्चि।। पेट्रोल की कीमतों में बार-बार बढ़ोतरी पर केरल हाई कोर्ट ने सख्त रुख अपनाया है। उसने शुक्रवार को कहा कि सरकारें इस मसले पर अपनी जिम्मेदारी से पल्ला नहीं झाड़ सकतीं। इसके विरोध के लिए राजनीतिक दलों का इंतजार करने के बजाय देश के लोगों को खुद सामने आना चाहिए। अदालत ने इंडियन ऑयल कॉरपोरेशन और रिलायंस पेट्रोलियम को अपनी बैलेंस शीट और तिमाही रिपोर्ट तीन सप्ताह में पेश करने का निदेर्श दिया।

एक जनहित याचिका पर सुनवाई करते हुए एक्टिंग चीफ जस्टिस सी.एन. रामचंद्रन नायन और जस्टिस पी.एस. गोपीनाथन ने मौखिक टिप्पणी में कहा कि पिछले एक साल में तेल के दाम 40 पर्सेंट से ज्यादा बढ़ गए हैं। इससे आम आदमी को भारी परेशानी का सामना करना पड़ रहा है। महंगाई धीमी मौत की तरह है।

राजनीतिक दल मुनाफा बटोर रहे हैं। उपभोक्ता विरोध नहीं कर पा रहे हैं। बार-बार की बढ़ोतरी में उन्हें ऐडजस्ट करना पड़ रहा है। अदालत ने कहा कि इस बढ़ोतरी से टू-वीइलर और छोटी कार चलाने वाले ज्यादा प्रभावित होते हैं, अमीर लोग नहीं क्योंकि वे डीजल की महंगी कारों में चलते हैं।

तेल कंपनियों को पेट्रोल के दाम बढ़ाने का अधिकार देने और बार-बार पेट्रोल महंगा होने के विरोध में यह जनहित याचिका पूर्व सांसद पी.सी. थॉमस ने दायर की है। राज्य सरकार के वकील ने तर्क दिया कि यह याचिका राजनीति से प्रेरित है। इस पर कोर्ट ने यह कहते हुए कि राजनीति में भी जनहित जुड़ा होता है, याचिका सुनवाई के लिए स्वीकार कर ली। हालांकि अदालत का कहना था कि तेल उत्पादों के दाम तय करने का अधिकार देना केंद सरकार का पॉलिसी मैटर है, पेट्रोल की मौजूदा बढ़ोतरी पर हम इसमें दखल नहीं दे सकते। पेट्रोल के दाम में बढ़ोतरी राष्ट्रीय मुद्दा है। हम इस पर स्टे नहीं लगा सकते।