Friday, June 28, 2013

Railway Official seeks stoppage of illegal sand ming in Sone river under Koilwar Railway Bridge

Underlining the dangers from illegal sand mining under in Sone river the railway bridge at Koilwar, Bhojpur, DRM of Danapur wrote to the District Magistrate of Bhojpur to bring to his notice the ongoing illegal sand mining in the prohibited area of Sone river at the site of Koilwar Rail cum Road Bridge.

In his letter he has sought stoppage of illegal sand mining apprehending weakening of the pillars supporting the railway bridge. Pursuant to this letter the District Magistrate constituted a seven member team comprising of SDO, Madhav Kumar Singh , Railways Engineer Pawan Kumar, Rakesh Kumar, a district official and Amarkant Singh inspected the northern and southern side of the Koilwar bridge to ascertain illegal sand mining in the area.

According to the news report dated June 7, 2013 in Bhojpur edition of Hindustan newspaper at page no. 3 the team did not find any illegal sand mining. But it also reported that the SDO asked the railway engineers to barricade the area of illegal sand mining by wires so that illegal mining can be stopped in the prohibited area. Railway engineer Pawan Kumar opined that the movement of vehicles loaded with sand is rampant on the eastern side of the railway bridge. R K Dubey, Office in Charge, Police Station, Koilwar and Bodh Narayanji Vimal, Mines Inspector were also present on the occasion.

       

Tuesday, June 11, 2013

Like NCTC, Biometric UID/Aadhaar too should not happen without legislation


Appeal made at Bangladesh Bharat Pakistan People's Forum (BBPPF) Meet to boycott biometric identification

Imran Khan informed of theft of Pakistan’s biometric UID database by Wikileaks founder  

Information on Aadhaar enrolment status of Cabinet Ministers, MPs, Nilekani, Ahluwalia denied

How many Bihar ministers, MLAs and MLCs have enrolled for Aadhaar?

Privacy under grave threat, UIDAI preparing the platform for NCTC and NATGRID

Aadhaar is not mandatory, Punjab and Haryana High Court bench

Patna/New Delhi June 11, 2013: While Bihar Chief Minister’s call for legislation for National Counter Terrorism Centre (NCTC) at the conference of chief ministers on internal security in New Delhi has merit but it is strange that Bihar Government has signed a legally questionable Memorandum of Understanding with Unique Identification Authority of India (UIDAI), Planning Commission to implement biometric data based Unique Identification (UID)/Aadhaar Number scheme without any legal and constitutional mandate. It is an admitted fact that UID/Aadhaar is linked to NCTC and National Intelligence Grid (NATGRID.) Both are two ends of the same rope.

In such a situation, how can the UID/Aadhaar be implemented in Bihar and other States when Parliamentary Standing Committee on Finance has rejected the National Identification Authority of India Bill, 2010 that was meant to legitimize the UIDAI.

Bihar Chief Minister has rightly argued that "If the Centre still considers it expedient to form an organisation like NCTC, then it should be done through legislation in Parliament which will ensure a wider debate over the subject." CFCL demands to know as to why the same logic should not apply in the case of the implementation of UID/Aadhaar Identifier Number scheme which is being undertaken without legislation.

In a significant development, Aadhaar enrolment status of Cabinet Ministers, MPs, Nilekani under RTI has been denied. The reply is attached. Citizens Forum for Civil Liberties (CFCL) demands to know as to how many Bihar ministers, MLAs and MLCs have enrolled for illegitimate and illegal Aadhaar. If they have not enrolled why are they not informing the citizens of the State about the reasons of their refusal to enrol for biometric identification.

CFCL which had given testimony to the Parliamentary Committee demands that Bihar Government should put a stay on the execution of the UID/Aadhaar related projects in the state following the grave concerns expressed by eminent citizens, former judges and academicians besides the Parliamentary Committee.

Speaking at a meeting of Bangladesh Bharat Pakistan People's Forum (BBPPF) on June 9, 2013, Gopal Krishna of CFCL which has been campaigning against emergence of a surveillance state, appealed for boycott of biometric identification through UID/Aadhaar. Mahtma Gandhi had opposed a similar project in South Africa. CFCL had given testimony to the Parliamentary Committee that rejected the UID Bill.

It is germane to note that Wikileaks founder in an interview with Imran Khan that Pakistan’s version of biometric exercise for identity card was completed and their database has been handed over to US Government.

In an interview Julian Assange, founder of WikiLeaks informed Imran Khan about the grave act of omission and commission saying, “we discovered a cable in 2009 from the Islamabad Embassy. Prime Minister Gilani and Interior Minister Malik went into the embassy and offered to share NADRA – and NADRA is the national data and registration agency database. The system is currently connected through passport data but the government of Pakistan is adding voice and facial recognition capability and has installed a pilot biometric system as the Chennai border crossing, where 30,000 to 35,000 people cross each day. This NADRA system, that is the voting record system for all voters in Pakistan, and a front company was set up in the United Kingdom – International Identity Services, which was hired as the consultants for NADRA to squirrel out the NADRA data for all of Pakistan. What do you think about that? Is that a…? It seems to me that that is a theft of some national treasure of Pakistan, the entire Pakistani database registry of its people.” The interview is available at http://worldtomorrow.wikileaks.org/episode-10.html  

Speaking at BBPPF Meet, Dr Sunilam, a senior socialist leader and former legislator from Madhya Pradesh endorsed the call for boycott of and denounced the aadhaar like schemes which facilitates tracking and profiling in the way it was done in Germany by the Nazi party that led to holocaust.     

Disregarding such gnawing concerns, central government’s disdain for the law has been characterized by Yashwant Sinha headed Parliamentary Standing Committee as `unethical and violative of Parliament's prerogatives'. Citizens have been protesting against the biometric data based UID and National Population Register (NPR) project across the country from the very outset. By now it is clear that it is an unnecessary project which must be stopped.

Earlier, on June 2, 2013, Aruna Roy, former member, National Advisory Council (NAC) questioned the legality of UID/Aadhaar number during her lecture at A N Sinha Institute of Social Studies, Patna and asserted that it is one of the biggest mistakes this country is making i.e. linking Aadhaar to welfare delivery.

The Parliamentary Standing Committee on Finance considering the National Identification Authority of India (NIDAI) Bill, 2010 presented its report to the Parliament on December 13, 2011. The report rejects biometric data based identification of Indians. The report is a severe indictment of the hasty and `directionless' project which has been "conceptualised with no clarity of purpose". Even the functional basis of the Unique Identification Authority of India UIDAI is unclear and yet the project has been rolled out. The Standing Committee found the biometric technology `uncertain' and 'untested'. Yet, the UIDAI has gone on with the exercise.

There is no data protection law in place. Even though the government had recognised the need for a law to deal with security and confidentiality of information, imposition of obligation of disclosure of information in certain cases, impersonation at the time of enrolment, investigation of acts that constitute offences and unauthorised disclosure of information, the UID/aadhaar project has been allowed to march on without any such protection being put in place.

In a significant development, a day long dharna on May 29, 2013 on Bhagat Singh Chowk, near Gandhi Maidan, Patna comprising of leaders and participants from nine minority communities of Sikh, Christian, Jain, Bengali, Buddhist and Muslims wherein an appeal was made by CFCL to boycott UID/Aadhaar else all kinds of minorities including political minorities will get profiled and tracked through biometric identification.

It is noteworthy that in a reply in the Lok Sabha on August 24, 2011, Union Minister of State for Planning, Science & Technology and Earth Sciences informed the Parliament about the commencement of operation of Unique Identification Authority of India (UIDAI) before the enactment of the National Identification Authority Bill, 2010. He categorically stated, “The Attorney General (AG) has opined that the UIDAI could continue with its work till the enactment of the Bill.”

Since the minister has assured the Parliament based on the legal opinion of the Attorney General that the “UIDAI could continue with its work till the enactment of the Bill”, given the fact that the Parliamentary Standing Committee on Finance has rejected the National Identification Authority of India Bill, 2010 questioning the legality of UIDAI, UID/Aadhaar project and the act of subordinate legislation for biometric data collection, there is no legal basis for the continued work of the UIDAI.

Attorney General’s opinion provided defense of UIDAI’s work only till the enactment of the Bill. Now this defence too now stands exhausted. It is also a fact that the Attorney General’s legal opinion in general has been under cloud and has been facing the flak of the Hon’ble Supreme Court.

On February 11, 2011, Nandan Nilekani, Chairman, UIDAI and Shri R.S. Sharma, Director General, UIDAI (currently Chief Secretary, Government of Jharkhand) besides the officials of Union Ministry of Planning had appeared before the Parliamentary Standing Committee on Finance.

The NIDAI Bill was introduced on December 3, 2010 in the Rajya Sabha was meant for legalizing and legitimizing the ongoing work done by Planning Commission’s UIDAI since January 28, 2009 as is evident from clause 57 of the Bill. The rejection of the Bill reveals that UIDAI officials could not defend the legally indefensible work on UIDAI without statutory status. Since this provision along with the Bill has been rejected the UIDAI itself has become legally indefensible.  

The Bill stated that it was meant to “to provide for the establishment of the National Identification Authority of India for the purpose of issuing identification numbers to individuals residing in India and to certain other classes of individuals and manner of authentication of such individuals to facilitate access to benefits and services to such individuals to which they are entitled and for matter connected therewith or incidental thereto.” The Bill did not define “to certain other classes of individuals”.

In the matter of now rejected National Identification Authority of India (NIAI) Bill, 2010, “NHRC’s views on the NIAI Bill, 2010″ in the Human Rights Newsletter (Vol. 18 No.8, August 2011) reveals that UID/Aadhaar Number has dangerous ramifications is quite relevant in this regard. NHRC’s view was presented to the Parliamentary Standing Committee (PSC) on Finance. The PSC submitted its report to the Parliament.

Echoing NHRC’s view on “need for protection of information” and “the possibility of tampering with stored biometric information” in paragraph 5 (page no. 7 of the NHRC newsletter) and “disclosure of information in the interest of national security” mentioned in paragraph 9 (page no.8 of the newsletter), the Central Government’s Approach Paper for Legislation on Privacy dated October 13, 2010 admits, “India does not currently have a general data protection statute” as per information received from Union Ministry of Personnel, Public Grievances and Pensions through Letter Reference No.071/1/2010/-IR dated October 18, 2010.

On UID Number, the Approach Paper on Privacy Bill stated, “Data privacy and the need to protect personal information is almost never a concern when data is stored in a decentralized manner. Data that is maintained in silos is largely useless outside that silo and consequently has a low likelihood of causing any damage. However, all this is likely to change with the implementation of the UID Project. One of the inevitable consequences of the UID Project will be that the UID Number will unify multiple databases. As more and more agencies of the government sign on to the UID Project, the UID Number will become the common thread that links all those databases together. Over time, private enterprise could also adopt the UID Number as an identifier for the purposes of the delivery of their services or even for enrolment as a customer.” The Approach Paper on Privacy Bill discloses, “Once this happens, the separation of data that currently exists between multiple databases will vanish.” This poses a threat to the identity of citizens and the idea of residents of the state as private persons will be forever abandoned.

In their testimony before the Parliamentary Standing Committee on Finance on June 29, 2011, Shri Rajiv Sharma, Secretary General, NHRC, Shri A.K. Garg, Registrar (Law), NHRC and Shri J.P. Meena, Joint Secretary (P&A), NHRC expressed their concerns. The report presented to the Parliament on December 13, 2011 records, “The Committee heard the representatives of the National Human Rights Commission on “The National Identification Authority of India Bill, 2010”. The major issues discussed during the sitting broadly related to nature, objective and beneficiaries of aadhaar number; possible discrimination and specific provisions that are required to be built in; safeguards needed for securing the stored information by the proposed National Identification Authority of India; implications of the provisions of the Bill on the individual‘s right to privacy, etc.”

In a setback to efforts to bulldoze UID and related schemes, following the direction issued to the Union of India and Union Territory of Chandigarh by Punjab and Haryana High Court in the matter of Civil Writ Petition 569 of 2013 filed in the High Court against Union of India and others, the Executive Order for making Unique Identification (UID)/Aadhaar mandatory has been withdrawn.

In its order the Punjab and Haryana High Court bench of Justice A K Sikri, Chief Justice and Justice Rakesh Kumar Jain dated February 19, 2013 had not noted that the petition “raises a pure question of law.” Since the Executive Order was withdrawn, the case too was disposed of March 2, 2013 with a two page order.  The Order observes, “In this writ petition filed as PIL, the petitioner has challenged the vires of notification issued by Union of India for making it compulsory to have UID Cards." It is further observed in the order that “Second issue raised in this petition is that vide order dated 5.12.2012, respondent No.3 i.e. Deputy Commissioner, U.T., Chandigarh has given directions to the Branch

In charge Registration-cum-Accountant, office of Registering & Licensing Authority, Chandigarh not to accept any application for registration of vehicle and grant of learner/regular driving licence without UID card.” 

Such attempts to make UID/Aadhaar have emerged as an act of bullying by the government agencies.

The petition before the Parliamentary Standing Committee on Subordinate legislation draws attention towards how all the residents and citizens of India are being made subordinate to prisoner’s status by the ongoing collection of their “biometric information” that includes finger prints, iris scan for permanent storage in a Centralized Identities Data Register (CIDR) and NPR. This is being done ‘as per an approved strategy” by Planning Commission and Union Ministry of Home Affairs without any legal mandate. CFCL demands that State Government should dissociate itself from UIDAI and related biometric identification exercises besides resisting attempts to erode State’s autonomy through entities like NCTC and NATGRID. Bihar Government should oppose efforts underway to link UID/Aadhaar with voter identity cards.     

For Details: Gopal Krishna, Citizens Forum for Civil Liberties (CFCL), Mb: 8227816731, 09818089660, E-mail: gopalkrishna1715@gmail.com  

Sunday, June 9, 2013

Autocratic action of Home Ministry against peoples' movements condemned in Patna

               tukf/kdkj la/k"kZ lfefr
                         izsl foKfIr
iVuk] 10 twu] 2013A ty] taxy vkSj tehu dh j{kk] lkaiznkf;drk ds f[kykQ vkSj ukxfjd vf/kdkjksa ds fy, la/k"kZjr tulax
               xkSjryc gS fd balkQ dk cSad [kkrk fiNys eghus 30 vizSy dks dsUnzh; x`gea=ky; us lhy dj fn;k] blds vykok ,Qlhvkj, dks Hkh 180 fnuksa ds fy, jn~n djus dk tufojks/kh QSlyk fy;k x;k gSA dsUnz ljdkj dh nyhy gS fd fons'kks ls feyusokyh vuqnku jkf'k dk mi;ksx turk ds fgrksa ds f[kykQ fd;k tkrk gSA ;s 'kCn dkWjiksjsV ?kjkuksa vkSj iwathifr;ksa ds gS] ftls ljdkj [kqn cksy jgh gSA njvly] futh vkSj cgqjk"Vh; daifu;ks ds nyky cu pqds jktusrkvks] m|ksxifr;ks vkSj ukSdj'kkgks dh frdM+h us 'kksf"krks o oafprks ds vf/kdkjks dks fcYdqy uhyke dj fn;k gSA
           vk'p;Z dh ckr gS fd ,Qlhvkj, dks jn~n djus dk i= ml le; vk;k tc varjk"Vh; forh; laLFkkvks vkSj ,f'k;u fodkl cSad ds xzsVj uks;Mk esa 2&5 ebZ] 2013 esa gks jgs lkykuk xoZuj cSBd dk fojks/k ns'kHkj ds lSdM+ks lax
             dsUnz ljdkj ns'k esa py jgs tuvkanksyuksa ls Hk;Hkhr gSA blfy, og tulaxBuks dks dqpyus ds fy, fuR; ubZ lkft'k jp jgh gSA Hkkjr ljdkj us o"kZ 2010 esa tks u;k ,Qlhvkj, dkuwu cuk;k] mlesa fu;e&3 lcls fookfnr i{k gSA u, fu;e ds vuqlkj dksbZ Hkh laxdqye ls ysdj dk'ehj rd ns'kHkj esa py jgs tukanksyuks o la/k"kksZ ij balkQ dh vge Hkwfedk jgh gSA ,sls esa dsUnz ljdkj us ,Qlhvkj, jn~n dj ;g lkfcr dj fn;k gS fd mlds vkSj dkjiksjsV ?kjkuks ds fgrksa ds f[kykQ tks dke djsxk] mldk vatke ;gh gksxkA vxj vMkuh ds f[kykQ tkjh la/k"kZ esa vxj cSuj iksLVj] ipsZ] fdrkcs] izn'kZu LFky dk [kpZ mBkuk vkSj ukxfjd vf/kdkjks dh ckr djuk xqukg gS] rks ;g le>k tk ldrk gS fd fdl rjg ljdkj lafo/kku iznr ekSfyd vf/kdkj vfHkO;fDr dk vf/kdkj vuqPNsn 19 , dk guu djds yksdra= dks va/ksjh lqjax esa ys tk jgh gSA
      jkT; ds lkekftd laxBu vkSj vkanksyu ekax djrs gS fd balkQ ds ,Qlhvkj, ds jn~n djus ds QSlys ij dsUnz ljdkj iqufoZpkj djs vkSj ml QSlys dks yksdra= ds fodkl ds fy, cnysA ;g QSlyk turkaf=d pfj= ls esy ugha [kkrk gS fd fdl rjg ljdkjs tufgr ds dk;Z dks tufgr fojks/kh dk;Z crk jgh gSA
        oDrkvksa esa canh vf/kdkj vkanksyu fcgkj ds larks"k mik/;k;] tukf/kdkj la/k"kZ lfefr ds bjQku vgen] lkekftd dk;ZdrkZ jatho dqekj] flVhtu Qksje QkWj flfoy fycjVht ds xksikyd`".k jgsA
laidZ&bjQku vgen&9431454109] bZesy&irfan.tree@gmail.com
xksiky d`".k&8227816731] bZesy&gopalkrishna1715@gmail.com
j.ktho dqekj&9334869616] bZesy&ranjeevkoshi@gmail.com
larks"k mik/;k;&8757070603]bZesy&bandiadhikar@gmail.com
fjlkslZ&insafvsfcra.blogspot.in

Janadhikar Sangharsh Samiti

Press Release
Autocratic action of Home Ministry against peoples' movements condemned
More than 300 organisations, action groups and grassroots activists, journalists, writers express their solidarity
Patna, June 10, 2013: Expressing solidarity with Indian Social Action Forum (INSAF), State's movements condemned the irrational and autocratic action of Home Ministry.
It is noteworthy that INSAF and its allies have been demanding that International Financial Institutions (IFIs) like World Bank Group should be brought under rigorous legislative scrutiny. In this regard it organized a People's Front Against IFIs during the 46th Annual Board of Governors’ Meeting (AGM) of the Asian Development Bank (ADB) in Greater Noida, Delhi during May 2-5, 2013.
Speakers wondered as to whether it is a coincidence that the letter of suspension was received while the meeting of Peoples Front Against IFIs was underway. At this meeting several Members of Parliament came and expressed their support for making IFIs subservient to legislative will.  Providing the reason for the suspension of the bank account wherein contributions are received under Foreign Contribution (Regulation) Act, 2010, the letter of April 30, 2013. The letter was received on May 4, 2013. In doing so it withheld the information on the basis of which the suspension order has been issued.
The Ministry’s letter is in reaction to INSAF’s case against the Foreign Contribution (Regulation) Act 2010 in the Supreme Court and the new rules formulated under which all democratic action such as rallies, demonstrations, protests etc. are prohibited. The Ministry should have waited for Supreme Court’s verdict instead of curtailing the constitutional rights to resist and protest to defend rights within the constitutional framework.  Such an impatient act of the Ministry through subordinate legislation and invoking of Section 13 curbs the right to freedom to protest and express dissenting voices.
INSAF has played an important role in such people oriented struggles. If giving support in getting posters, banners and booklets printed, their distribution, bearing expenses for their display and saying things in defence of democracy becomes a political activity because of which your livelihood can be snatched, then it raises a very serious question: Is there any democracy in this country or not? The fundamental right to free expression under Article 19 (A) that we keep reciting, does it have any meaning?
Social organizations and movements of the state demanded a review and withdrawal of the order of suspension of the FCRA account of INSAF. INSAF and its allies are always engaged in defending democratic rights of deprived communities and in strengthening secular spirit of the nation. It is incomprehensible as to how such work in genuine public interest is deemed to be against public interest.
INSAF was created, post-Babri Masjid demolition, so that public consciousness could be raised on issues related to communalism, globalization and divisive politics.
The speakers denounced the double standard of the government is quite visible. It is so beholden to foreign direct investment (FDI) but it is acting against the unification of resistance which is globally vibrant gives meaning to democracy.
Freezing of bank account cannot stifle democratic voice of dissent. Our right to resistance against right wing politics and economics is guaranteed by constitution. The policies of international financial institutions like World Bank Group remain a threat to democracy and we will resist it in public interest. How can being prejudicial to public interest be deemed a ground for suspension when the democratic practice is based on the prejudices about the public interest?
 At the conference a statement endorsed by more than 300 organisations, action groups and grassroots activists, journalists, writers etc. was also released. The statement expresses its solidarity with the stand of INSAF in asserting the constitutional right of every citizen of India to participate in governance, which includes the right to question, challenge and oppose the policies of the state through peaceful, non-violent and democratic means.
The speakers stressed the need to visit the FCRA, 1976 and the amendments done to it in 2010 as well as the Rules formulated in 2011. A look at this will expose the real intent of the government as well as its repressive politics in the garb of stopping/curbing foreign funding. The new amendments to the FCRA done in 2010, especially its Rule 3, are highly controversial and are very relevant in understanding the current context and controversy. It says that activities of any organization which habitually engages itself in or employs common methods of political action like Bandh or hartal  (strike), Rasta Roko (stopping trafffic), Rail Roko (Stopping Trains) or Jail Bharo (fill up jails) in support of public causes will be deemed as political in nature even if it is not a political party. The government, of course, has reserved the right to define or designate those organizations which will fall in this category. Such organizations cannot be recipients of foreign funding.
INSAF has challenged these very legal provisions on 5th August 2011 in the Delhi High Court but its writ petition was rejected on 16 September 2011. Subsequently, INSAF filed the same writ in the Supreme Court of India which was admitted. The Supreme Court has asked the Government to file a reply which it has not filed till date. It is interesting and ironic that while INSAF challenged the provisions of the FCRA which curb funding of organizations by designating their activities as political in nature, INSAF itself has been made a very first example of such prosecution and its bank accounts sealed by the govt this month in the name of political activities.
The Government wants to rein in peoples struggles related to land, forests, water and for dignity going on all over India from Tamil Nadu to Kashmir. It also wants to curb all the basic facilities available to such organizations & individuals.
The speakers included Santosh Upadhyaya, Bandi Adhikar Andolan, Bihar, Ranjeev Kumar, Social Activist, Irfan Ahmed, Janadhikar Sangharsh Samiti, Bihar and Gopal Krishna, Citizens Forum for Civil Liberties (CFCL)
The press conference was organised on June 10, 2013 from 10-11.30 AM at the Lower Conference Hall of Indian Medical Association (IMA) Building, Dr A K N Singh Path, South East of Gandhi Maidan, Patna.  

For further information: Irfan Ahmed, Janadhikar Sangharsh Samiti, Mb: 9431454109Santosh Upadhyaya, Bandi Adhikar Andolan, Mb:8986463504, , Gopal Krishna, CFCL, Mb: 09818089660

Press Conference on the autocratic action of Home Ministry against Indian Social Action Forum in Patna

Press Invitation
for Press Conference
on
the autocratic action of Home Ministry against Indian Social Action Forum
Dear Sir/Madam,
This is to invite you for a Press Conference on the autocratic action of Union Ministry of Home Affairs against Indian Social Action Forum (INSAF), a registered voluntary organisation working as forum of over 700 movements across the country. The action came while a conference of People’s Front Against International Financial Institutions was underway. This is an exercise to curb the democratic right to dissent. INSAF has filed a case against the undemocratic and unconstitutional guidelines of the ministry in the Supreme Court.  
In order to protest against such actions of the Ministry of Home Affairs and to show the real picture of the issue, a press conference is being organised on June 10, 2013 from 10-11.30 AM at the Lower Conference Hall of Indian Medical Association (IMA) Building, Dr A K N Singh Path, South East of Gandhi Maidan, Patna.   
Kindly depute a reporter to cover the press conference.
Date: Monday, June 10, 2013
Time: 10 am to 11.30 am
Venue: Lower Conference Hall of Indian Medical Association (IMA) Building, DR A K N Singh Path, South East of Gandhi Maidan, Patna
Invited Speakers at the conference:
·         Santosh Upadhyaya, Bandi Adhikar Andolan, Bihar  
·         Dr Sunilam, Kisan Sangharsh Samiti
·         Ranjeev Kumar, Social Activist  
·         Irfan Ahmed, Janadhikar Sangharsh Samiti, Bihar    
·         Gopal Krishna, Citizens Forum for Civil Liberties (CFCL)
Regards
Irfan Ahmed
Mb:   9431454109

Sunday, June 2, 2013

Aruna Roy's call for questioning legality of UID/Aadhaar Number welcomed

Citizens Forum for Civil Liberties (CFCL) welcomes Aruna Roy's call for questioning legality of UID/Aadhaar Number

Collection of biometric data is illegal and illegitimate 

State Government should unsign the MOU with UIDAI

Patna, June 2, 2013: Delivering the Pradhan Jwala Prasad Memorial Lecture on "The Challenge of Transparency and Accountability in Indian Democracy", at A N Sinha Institute of Social Studies she appealed to citizens to question the legality and need of Unique Identification UID/Aadhaar, which is the world's biggest biometric database project. She categorically stated that cash transfer and UID is not working on the ground. Citizens Forum for Civil Liberties (CFCL) welcomes Aruna Roy's call for questioning legality of UID/Aadhaar number.
Roy, a former member of the National Advisory Council has long held that "The UID is a dangerous thing." She has said in the past that "How can you force the people to give all this information? The real intention of UID was integration with the National Intelligence Grid (NATGRID). There should be a political debate on whether the state should collect all data about us and store it in a central silo."
She said that it is one of the biggest mistakes this country is making i.e. linking Aadhar to welfare delivery. 
She has stated that there is a definite agenda to push (implementation) before legislation. How can the UID/Aadhaar be implemented when Parliamentary Standing Committee on Finance rejected the Bill that was meant to legitimize the Unique Identification Authority of India (UIDAI).
A compelling logic has emerged for the Bihar Government to put a stay on the execution of the aadhaar related projects in the state following a revealing report of a multi-party Parliamentary Standing Committee (PSC) on Finance that considered the National Identification Authority of India (NIDAI) Bill, 2010 and following the grave concerns expressed by eminent citizens, former judges and academicians. Unique Identification Authority of India (UIDAI) had signed a MoU with Bihar Government on August 20, 2010 without any legal and constitutional mandate.
This disdain for the law has been characterized by the Standing Committee as `unethical and violative of Parliament's prerogatives'. Citizens have been protesting against the UID and NPR based MINIC project across the country from the very outset but prior to PSC’s report it was ignored. By now it is clear that it is an unnecessary project which must be stopped.
The Parliamentary Standing Committee on Finance considering the National Identification Authority of India (NIDAI) Bill, 2010 presented its report to the Parliament on December 13, 2011. The report rejects biometric data based identification of Indians. The report is a severe indictment of the hasty and `directionless' project which has been "conceptualised with no clarity of purpose". Even the functional basis of the Unique Identification Authority of India UIDAI is unclear and yet the project has been rolled out. The Standing Committee found the biometric technology `uncertain' and 'untested'. As early as December 2009, the Biometric Data Committee had found that the error rate using fingerprints was inordinately high. In a recent interview to the press, the Director General and Mission Director of the UIDAI had admitted that fingerprints are likely not to work for authentication. The error rate could end up excluding up to 15% of the population. Yet, the UIDAI has gone on with the exercise.
There is no data protection law in place. Even though the government had recognised the need for a law to deal with security and confidentiality of information, imposition of obligation of disclosure of information in certain cases, impersonation at the time of enrolment, investigation of acts that constitute offences and unauthorised disclosure of information, the Unique Identification (UID) project was allowed to march on without any such protection being put in place.
The Parliamentary Report has raised questions of great severity about the legality and constitutionality of the Unique Identification (UID) project. It has acknowledged the many concerns that have been voiced in the past two years about the absence of a feasibility study, no cost-benefit assessment, uncertain and untested technology, an enrolment process that has national security repercussions, the lack of data protection and privacy legislation and the disrespect for Parliament by going ahead with a project that was pending parliamentary approval. It is also noticed that the data that is being collected is not being held by a government agency, about which the National Informatics Centre has expressed anxiety.
During the conversation with Roy, Shri Ajay Singh, a former public service official informed how biometric identification was used by KGB, an intelligence agency of former Soviet Union to keep track of foreigners and suspects but it was not used for citizens. 
Earlier, in a significant development, Indian Social Action Forum (INSAF), Bihar organised a day long dharna on May 29, 2013 on Bhagat Singh Chwok, near Gandhi Maidan, Patna comprising of leaders and participants from nine minority communities of Sikh, Christian, Jain, Bengali, Buddhist and Muslims wherein an appeal was made by CFCL to boycott UID/Aadhaar else all kinds of minorities including political minorities will get profiled and tracked through biometric identification. The key participants in the Dharna included Triloki Singh, Rajendra Kamal, Irfan Ahmad, Pushpraj, Surendra Ghosh, Surendra Bodh and Mahendra Bodh.  
Roy has said in the past that "I'm shocked minorities and other communities are not boycotting it." Citizens Forum for Civil Liberties (CFCL) had given testimony to the Parliamentary Committee which sent  the Bill back to the drawing board.
For Details: Gopal Krishna, Citizens Forum for Civil Liberties (CFCL), Mb: 8227816731, 09818089660

Saturday, June 1, 2013

RTI Activist Aruna Roy in Patna, CFCL welcomes her call for boycotting UID/Aadhaar

Citizens Forum for Civil Liberties (CFCL) welcomes RTI activist Aruna Roy's call for boycotting UID/Aadhaar. She is in Patna to deliver a lecture at A N Sinha Institute of Social Studies.

On UID/Aadhaar, Roy holds that "The UID is a dangerous thing. I'm shocked minorities and other communities are not boycotting it."

She says, "How can you force the people to give all this information? The real intention of UID was integration with the National Intelligence Grid (NATGRID). There should be a political debate on whether the state should collect all data about us and store it in a central silo."

"There is a definite agenda to push (implementation) before legislation."

"We think it is one of the biggest mistakes this country is making i.e. linking Aadhar to welfare delivery”.

In a significant development, INSAF, Bihar organised a day long dharna on May 29, 2013 on Bhagat Singh Chwok, near Gandhi Maidan, Patna comprising of leaders and participants from nine minority communities of Sikh, Christian, Jain, Bengali, Buddhist and Muslims wherein an appeal was made by CFCL to boycott UID/Aadhaar else all kinds of minorities including political minorities will get profiled and tracked through biometric identification. The key participants in the Dharna included Triloki Singh, Rajendra Kamal, Irfan Ahmad, Pushpraj, Surendra Ghosh, Surendra Bodh and Mahendra Bodh.